THIS IS A TWO PART ASSIGNMENTS. DETAILS MATTERS. I WILL DO THE VIDEO, I JUST WANT YOU TO HELP WITH THE OUTLINES AND IN PART TWO, WE MAY HAVE TO WORK TOGETHER TO GET IT DONE. PART 1 IS DUE BY THURSDAY PART 1 “The TED style is effective because it’s consistent with how our brains are wired to receive information.” – Carmine Gallo According to its website, TED is a nonprofit organization “devoted to spreading ideas, usually in the form of short, powerful talks. TED began in 1984 as a conference where Technology, Entertainment, and Design converged, and today covers almost all topics — from science to business to global issues — in more than 100 languages.” (TED, 2016, Our organization) (Links to an external site.) Since establishing a presence online in 2006, TED Talks are commonly heralded as presentations that resonate; in fact, these online presentations have been viewed more than one billion times. Please proceed to the ‘Instructions’ section for detailed instructions on your initial post. Step One – Find a TED Talk: To analyze a TED presentation, start by finding one that resonates with you. TED.com allows you to search by topic or by speaker. Watch a few speeches until you find one that grabs your attention within the first 30 seconds and keeps you hooked from start to finish. Any TED or TEDx Talk will work for this assignment. Important Note: Please do not select a “Best of the Web” talk, as these presentations were not delivered on the TED stage. Step Two – Take Notes: Begin your analysis by taking notes while you watch your chosen TED Talk from start to finish for the first time. What are the strengths of the presentation? What are the weaknesses? Step Three – Develop an Analysis:After completing Steps One and Two, watch your TED Talk a second time. Create a thorough analysis of your chosen presentation by addressing the following five prompts in detail: Identify the speaker, the title, and the purpose of the TED Talk. Describe the storytelling in the TED Talk. What are the primary stories told? Where are these stories (introduction, body, conclusion)? Do the stories keep the audience engaged? How does the TED Talk begin and end? Describe the techniques used to grab the audience’s attention in the introduction and to resonate with the audience in the conclusion. Describe the speaker’s use of the following from Chapter 8: examples, statistics, testimony, and oral citations. Is the speech well supported overall? Which of these forms of support works best for the audience? On a scale from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest), rate the TED Talk overall. Describe why you assigned that numerical rating. Be sure to post your Original Post by the 4th day of the module week. PART 2 Step One Revised Outline: In Module 2, you developed the first draft of your Informative Presentation Outline. In this module, you will revise that outline into a Speaking Outline to best prepare for your Informative Presentation. This presentation will be 4-5 minutes. What feedback did you receive from your classmates and from your instructor? Revise your outline with these suggestions. What did you learn from your Module 3 readings, videos, and lessons? From your other class assignments Revise your outline incorporating this new knowledge. In Module 2, you told a 30-second story which was to align with the purpose of the Informative Presentation. What feedback did you receive from your instructor? Where in your Informative Presentation will this story best fit? Revise your outline to include your 30-second story. Remember that an outline is different from an essay. An outline uses bullet points and phrases versus complete sentences. Your revised outline should contain the following elements clearly labeled: A) Introduction with attention-getter/hook and central idea (use Chapter 10 in The Art of Public Speaking) B) Body with three main points (use Chapter 8 and 9 in The Art of Public Speaking), C) Conclusion (use Chapter 10 in The Art of Public Speaking). Revise your outline to ensure your presentation is well-structured and engaging from start to finish. Step Two Delivering Your Informative Presentation: First, practice delivering your Informative Presentation with a stopwatch so that you can ensure your speech is 4-5 minutes. This may involve cutting, editing, or making additional changes to your Informative Presentation Outline from Step One. Once you are confident in the length of your Informative Presentation, film a video of yourself delivering the speech. Step Three Submitting Your Work: To submit your Module 3 – Assignment: Informative Presentation, please include a word processor document with your Revised Informative Presentation Outline from Step One and a video file or a link to your 4-5 minute Informative Presentation. Reminder Before posting your video, please ensure that you have met the basic expectations outlined in Instructions on Recording Speeches (PDF) and “How To Guide” on the Module 1 Recording and Sharing Presentations page. 5 attachments Slide 1 of 5 attachment_1 attachment_1 attachment_2 attachment_2 attachment_3 attachment_3 attachment_4 attachment_4 attachment_5 attachment_5 1 Outline Step one: Topic: mental Illness General purpose: To inform Specific purpose: this presentation will inform with a detailed picture of what our service members are going through, with the hope of creating awareness for a solution. Central idea: This presentation will investigate mental health as it has affected the Japanese superstar Naomi Osaka leading to her withdraw from participation in French Openings. 1. Introduction A. Mental health has affected most people as they serve their country. In this presentation. I will use the case of Naomi Osaka who is a Japanese Tennis superstar and has been a victim of mental health to investigate the impacts of mental health on women. 2. . BODY A. This presentation will investigate how mental health started to affect Naomi the exposure to mental health. B. Additionally, it will explore how mental health has affected the men and women in the military and what they can do to mitigate the problem of mental health. C. It will also explore how the leaders can contribute to mental health challenges. This presentation will investigate how the mental health started affected Naomi, the exposure, PTSD. 2 D. It will then explore how the campaign can be used to mitigate the issue of mental health. It will offer recommendations of the various strategies which can be used to curb the mental health problem. 3. Conclusion To curb this problem of mental health on men and women in service, a campaign needs to be conducted to end the suicide and mental illness. • Hello Gabriel, I think you have great content for the outline of your informative speech, but I think you’re going to have similar issues that I ran into with the proper format of the APA outline. I would suggest reading the announcement that the Prof. sent out this helped me complete the assignment after the fourth or fifth try. I hope this helps. Vr Chad ReplyReply to Comment o Collapse SubdiscussionGabriel Oyebanji Gabriel Oyebanji ThursdayJul 15 at 11:25pm Manage Discussion Entry Yes Chad, your right, I just returned from a long trip assignment and read the review– not pleased, and I need to make instant adjustment. Thanks again. ReplyReply to Comment • Collapse SubdiscussionFiona Balleydier Fiona Balleydier FridayJul 16 at 4:59pm Manage Discussion Entry Gabriel, This is a good topic to talk about. I think a lot of us military can relate to it especially. I know someone who was SPECOPS in the army, and has a hard time dealing with his PTSD. He is constantly seeing a doctor to handle his mental health. Fiona INSTRUCTOR FEEDBACK Hi Gabriel: Please review the information below: Week 2 – Information on the Steps 1 and 2 in the designated Topic & Purpose (Step 1) and sample Preparation Outline format (Step 2) Step One – Define the Topic & Purpose: For your Informative Presentation, use Chapter 5 in The Art of Public Speaking to help you brainstorm topics you already have personal knowledge and experience with – a familiar topic you know a lot about. Your general purpose is to inform, so use pp. 82-92 to help you determine your specific purpose and your central idea. Label your topic, general purpose (to inform), specific purpose, and central idea as “Step One.” Step Two – Create the Outline: Once you’ve completed Step One, develop your Informative Presentation Preparation Outline as Step Two. See pages 210-213 in Lucas for information on the Preparation Outline. Remember that an outline is different from an essay. An outline uses Roman Numerals, Capital Letters, Arabic Numbers, and Lower Case Letters to express ideas either in phrases and/or complete sentences. Your Preparation Outline must contain the following elements clearly labeled: STEP 1 Title State the General Purpose State the Specific Purpose State the Central Idea STEP 2 [Write your Preparation Outline starting here:] (And please note, this outline format is more simplified that the Preparation Outline that is presented in Lucas, Pages 210-213. Either format is acceptable for this assignment.) I. Introduction A. With an attention-getter/story 1. IF NEEDED 2. IF NEEDED B. “Hook” the audience 1. IF NEEDED 2. IF NEEDED II. Body A. First point……no need to indicate that this is a Subpoint—–just write out your idea. 1. IF NEEDED 2. IF NEEDED B. Second point….no need to indicate that this is a Subpoint—-just write out your idea. 1. IF NEEDED 2. IF NEEDED C. Third point…no need to indicate that this is a Subpoint…..just write out your idea here. 1. IF NEEDED 2. IF NEEDED III. Conclusion A. Provide a Summary B. You can offer a famous quote/end with a story, etc. Remember we do not use bullets, and you have to follow the specific APA outline format as written above. Review and resubmit using the correct format presented above. Also, you need to post two peer posts for this module. I need this by 11:59 p.m. EST on July 18, 2021. Once you revise your work, I will delete the incorrect work. Priscilla Jul 15 a Your second posting of the Preparation Outline is still incorrect. I recommend that you read your peers work—AND SEE WHERE your peers have received my comment of EXCELLENT WORK—i.e. Ava, Nathaniel, Alexander….see how they have written their work—and use that format. Need your corrected work on this Preparation Outline before 11:59 p.m. EST on 7/18/21. Good luck. PR Priscilla Jul 17 a 11:35pm Good afternoon Ma’am, I’ve worked on my discussion again, I will love to know if there are anymore updates. Thanks Greetings Gabriel, Good information presented in your two peer posts to Matthew and to Maria where you enjoyed their topics that they have selected for the upcoming Informative Speech presentation. Your information was well-written and very positive. Great job. WATCH FOR SMALL ERRORS: I saw the last two corrected submitted Preparation Outlines and information in Step 1 was good; but in Step 2, the Main Points were incorrect. You had the Main Points of the Introduction, Body, and Conclusion written with Arabic Numbers, i.e. 1, 2, 3—that is incorrect. The Main Points are to be written with Roman Numerals—as I provided the example on Jul 15 above (-17pt). Gabriel Oyeban at 1:42p • Hello Gabriel, I think you have great content for the outline of your informative speech, but I think you’re going to have similar issues that I ran into with the proper format of the APA outline. I would suggest reading the announcement that the Prof. sent out this helped me complete the assignment after the fourth or fifth try. I hope this helps. Chad ReplyReply to Comment o ThursdayJul 15 at 11:25pm Manage Discussion Entry Yes Chad, your right, I just returned from a long trip assignment and read the review– not pleased, and I need to make instant adjustment. Thanks again. ReplyReply to Comment • FridayJul 16 at 4:59pm Manage Discussion Entry Gabriel, This is a good topic to talk about. I think a lot of us military can relate to it especially. I know someone who was SPECOPS in the army, and has a hard time dealing with his PTSD. He is constantly seeing a doctor to handle his mental health. Fiona INSTRUCTOR FEEDBACK Hi Gabriel: Please review the information below: Week 2 – Information on the Steps 1 and 2 in the designated Topic & Purpose (Step 1) and sample Preparation Outline format (Step 2) Step One – Define the Topic & Purpose: For your Informative Presentation, use Chapter 5 in The Art of Public Speaking to help you brainstorm topics you already have personal knowledge and experience with – a familiar topic you know a lot about. Your general purpose is to inform, so use pp. 82-92 to help you determine your specific purpose and your central idea. Label your topic, general purpose (to inform), specific purpose, and central idea as “Step One.” Step Two – Create the Outline: Once you’ve completed Step One, develop your Informative Presentation Preparation Outline as Step Two. See pages 210-213 in Lucas for information on the Preparation Outline. Remember that an outline is different from an essay. An outline uses Roman Numerals, Capital Letters, Arabic Numbers, and Lower Case Letters to express ideas either in phrases and/or complete sentences. Your Preparation Outline must contain the following elements clearly labeled: STEP 1 Title State the General Purpose State the Specific Purpose State the Central Idea STEP 2 [Write your Preparation Outline starting here:] (And please note, this outline format is more simplified that the Preparation Outline that is presented in Lucas, Pages 210-213. Either format is acceptable for this assignment.) I. Introduction A. With an attention-getter/story 1. IF NEEDED 2. IF NEEDED B. “Hook” the audience 1. IF NEEDED 2. IF NEEDED II. Body A. First point……no need to indicate that this is a Subpoint—–just write out your idea. 1. IF NEEDED 2. IF NEEDED B. Second point….no need to indicate that this is a Subpoint—-just write out your idea. 1. IF NEEDED 2. IF NEEDED C. Third point…no need to indicate that this is a Subpoint…..just write out your idea here. 1. IF NEEDED 2. IF NEEDED III. Conclusion A. Provide a Summary B. You can offer a famous quote/end with a story, etc. Remember we do not use bullets, and you have to follow the specific APA outline format as written above. Review and resubmit using the correct format presented above. Also, you need to post two peer posts for this module. I need this by 11:59 p.m. EST on July 18, 2021. Once you revise your work, I will delete the incorrect work. Your second posting of the Preparation Outline is still incorrect. I recommend that you read your peers work–AND SEE WHERE your peers have received my comment of EXCELLENT WORK—i.e. Ava, Nathaniel, Alexander….see how they have written their work—and use that format. Need your corrected work on this Preparation Outline before 11:59 p.m. EST on 7/18/21. Good luck. PR Greetings Gabriel, Good information presented in your two peer posts to Matthew and to Maria where you enjoyed their topics that they have selected for the upcoming Informative Speech presentation. Your information was well-written and very positive. Great job. WATCH FOR SMALL ERRORS: I saw the last two corrected submitted Preparation Outlines and information in Step 1 was good; but in Step 2, the Main Points were incorrect. You had the Main Points of the Introduction, Body, and Conclusion written with Arabic Numbers, i.e. 1, 2, 3—that is incorrect. The Main Points are to be written with Roman Numerals—as I provided the example on Jul 15 above (-17pt). • Hello Gabriel, I think you have great content for the outline of your informative speech, but I think you’re going to have similar issues that I ran into with the proper format of the APA outline. I would suggest reading the announcement that the Prof. sent out this helped me complete the assignment after the fourth or fifth try. I hope this helps. Chad ReplyReply to Comment o ThursdayJul 15 at 11:25pm Manage Discussion Entry Yes Chad, your right, I just returned from a long trip assignment and read the review– not pleased, and I need to make instant adjustment. Thanks again. ReplyReply to Comment • FridayJul 16 at 4:59pm Manage Discussion Entry Gabriel, This is a good topic to talk about. I think a lot of us military can relate to it especially. I know someone who was SPECOPS in the army, and has a hard time dealing with his PTSD. He is constantly seeing a doctor to handle his mental health. Fiona INSTRUCTOR FEEDBACK Hi Gabriel: Please review the information below: Week 2 – Information on the Steps 1 and 2 in the designated Topic & Purpose (Step 1) and sample Preparation Outline format (Step 2) Step One – Define the Topic & Purpose: For your Informative Presentation, use Chapter 5 in The Art of Public Speaking to help you brainstorm topics you already have personal knowledge and experience with – a familiar topic you know a lot about. Your general purpose is to inform, so use pp. 82-92 to help you determine your specific purpose and your central idea. Label your topic, general purpose (to inform), specific purpose, and central idea as “Step One.” Step Two – Create the Outline: Once you’ve completed Step One, develop your Informative Presentation Preparation Outline as Step Two. See pages 210-213 in Lucas for information on the Preparation Outline. Remember that an outline is different from an essay. An outline uses Roman Numerals, Capital Letters, Arabic Numbers, and Lower Case Letters to express ideas either in phrases and/or complete sentences. Your Preparation Outline must contain the following elements clearly labeled: STEP 1 Title State the General Purpose State the Specific Purpose State the Central Idea STEP 2 [Write your Preparation Outline starting here:] (And please note, this outline format is more simplified that the Preparation Outline that is presented in Lucas, Pages 210-213. Either format is acceptable for this assignment.) I. Introduction A. With an attention-getter/story 1. IF NEEDED 2. IF NEEDED B. “Hook” the audience 1. IF NEEDED 2. IF NEEDED II. Body A. First point……no need to indicate that this is a Subpoint—–just write out your idea. 1. IF NEEDED 2. IF NEEDED B. Second point….no need to indicate that this is a Subpoint—-just write out your idea. 1. IF NEEDED 2. IF NEEDED C. Third point…no need to indicate that this is a Subpoint…..just write out your idea here. 1. IF NEEDED 2. IF NEEDED III. Conclusion A. Provide a Summary B. You can offer a famous quote/end with a story, etc. Remember we do not use bullets, and you have to follow the specific APA outline format as written above. Review and resubmit using the correct format presented above. Also, you need to post two peer posts for this module. I need this by 11:59 p.m. EST on July 18, 2021. Once you revise your work, I will delete the incorrect work. Your second posting of the Preparation Outline is still incorrect. I recommend that you read your peers work–AND SEE WHERE your peers have received my comment of EXCELLENT WORK—i.e. Ava, Nathaniel, Alexander….see how they have written their work—and use that format. Need your corrected work on this Preparation Outline before 11:59 p.m. EST on 7/18/21. Good luck. PR Greetings Gabriel, Good information presented in your two peer posts to Matthew and to Maria where you enjoyed their topics that they have selected for the upcoming Informative Speech presentation. Your information was well-written and very positive. Great job. WATCH FOR SMALL ERRORS: I saw the last two corrected submitted Preparation Outlines and information in Step 1 was good; but in Step 2, the Main Points were incorrect. You had the Main Points of the Introduction, Body, and Conclusion written with Arabic Numbers, i.e. 1, 2, 3—that is incorrect. The Main Points are to be written with Roman Numerals—as I provided the example on Jul 15 above (-17pt). 1 Ted Talks Student’s Name Institutional Affiliation Professor’s Name Course Number Date 2 Human Nature and The Blank Slate 1. The speaker, Steven Pinker, talks about various controversies in his book, The Blank Slate, which is derived from an idea that the mind of a human is a blank slate. The speaker says there are different reasons which make it hard to believe that the mind of a human is a blank slate. The reasons why the brain is not perceived as a blank slate include common sense, the study of human universals, genetics, and neuroscience. The speaker also talks about how the blank slate has a political appeal (Pinker, 2003). He says that if human beings are blank slates, then it shows that they are all equal. However, if anything is written on the slate then it is likely that some people may have more of it than others. As a result, there would be discrimination and inequality. He says that another political fear of human nature is that if human beings were blank slates, then social engineering can be used to perfect mankind. However, if human beings are born with particular instincts, then some of the instincts may denounce human beings as violent and selfish. The speaker goes on to refute the political fears by claiming fairness cannot be equated to sameness, that is, ignoble intentions do not automatically result in ignoble behavior. The most interesting thing that the speaker has said is that art is not in decline but is flourishing contrary to what people believe. However, there has been a decline in elite art and criticism. The speaker concludes that in the future, the sciences of human nature will upset numerous careers, as well as political belief systems. 2. The philosophical idea that informs the speaker’s thoughts is John Locke’s philosophy, Tabula rasa. John Locke was a seventeenth-century philosopher. This theory stipulates that people are born with blank slates mentally (DUSCHINSKY, 2012). Consequently, all knowledge 3 comes from perceptions and experience. The tabula rasa is countered by various proponents that stipulate that the mind is born with some knowledge. The speaker agrees with the philosopher, John Locke, in his book. He goes on to discuss the various reasons to doubt the mind as a blank slate such as common sense, genetics, and the study of human universals (Pinker, 2003). Pinker also supports John Locke’s philosophy by refuting the political fears of human nature by claiming ignoble motives do not automatically lead to ignoble behavior and fairness is not equal to sameness. He also talks about the proponents of the tabula rasa that claim that the human mind is not blank at birth but possesses some knowledge. 3. I do not agree with the speaker’s reasoning that the human mind is born with a blank slate. I do not agree with him because children, particularly babies, often behave in a peculiar manner when certain objects are shown to them and then hidden. Scientists have done tests to ascertain the brain activity of babies when objects such as a toy train are shown to them and hidden. They have discovered that even when the toy is hidden from sight, the baby still thinks about the toy train. The train was turned on and the child’s brain activity was analyzed when he saw it and when it disappeared into the tunnel. In both cases, there was a burst of electrical activity in the temporal lobe. This shows that the baby expected to see the train again from the tunnel. However, I agree with the speaker’s conclusion that most studies of parenting are useless since they don’t control heritability. Moreover, they only analyze the cause and effect pattern of parent-child relationships. How Do You Explain Consciousness? 1. 4 The speaker, David Chalmers, says that consciousness is among the most essential facts of existence. It is the subjective experience of both the mind and the whole world. Every human being is conscious of his or her inner movie. The speaker also says that consciousness is what makes life worth living. If human beings were unconscious, nothing in life would have meaning and value. Moreover, consciousness is the most mysterious phenomenon in the entire universe. Recent scientific investigations seek to explore the relationship between human consciousness and parts of the human brain (Chalmers, 2014). However, even the standard paradigms of neuroscience cannot explain why certain behaviors are a result of human consciousness. The speaker says that consciousness is an anomaly that human beings need to incorporate into their understanding of the world but they do not see how to do that. However, radical ideas are needed to solve this anomaly. Chalmers says that one of these crazy ideas is that consciousness is essential. The second wild idea is that consciousness may be universal such that every system is conscious. The speaker says that the simplest explanation is to connect consciousness to information such that whenever an information is being processed, there is consciousness. For ethical considerations, what matters is not the existence of consciousness but its degree. The speaker mostly supports the first crazy idea than the second one. 2. The philosophical idea that informs the speaker’s thoughts is the integrated information theory. This theory relates consciousness with some physical systems (Tononi, 2008). If there is such a system, the theory analyzes whether the system is conscious, the degree of its consciousness, and the experience it has. Moreover, the causal properties of a system determine its consciousness. This makes it a fundamental, intrinsic property of any system. The speaker says that linking information systems to consciousness is the simplest explanation that links 5 fundamental laws to physical processing (Chalmers, 2014). If a system processes information, then it has consciousness. Where there is intricate information processing such as in human beings, there is intricate consciousness. However, where there is simple information processing there is simple consciousness. The speaker then talks about the ethical concerns by saying what matters most is not the element of consciousness but its degree. The speaker also uses the panpsychism philosophy of mind which states that the mind of humans is an essential feature of the world that exists universally (Conty, 2021). He says that consciousness does not hang out of the physical world but it is there right at its heart. 3. I agree with the speaker that consciousness is among the most essential facts of existence. This is because everyone is self-conscious. Moreover, I agree that we all have our inner movies that make life worth living. I also agree that various scientific research has failed to come up with a theory that ascertains what consciousness is. All that exists today is an analysis of the relationship between consciousness and brain activity. Furthermore, I believe that the information system that processes the information they have is conscious. I agree with his conclusions that it is not the fact of consciousness but its degree. The reason I agree is that from the theory, even chickens are conscious. However, they have a very low degree of consciousness. This means that a chicken’s brain processes very little information. The ethical concern is that I cannot eat anything with a high degree of consciousness. My Wish: The Charter For Compassion 1. 6 The speaker, Karen Armstrong, says that the study of other religious traditions gave her a sense of what religion can be. She says that she realized that belief is a current religious interest that arose in the West around the 17th Century. In the Quran, religious orthodoxy is dismissed as religious guesswork because no one is certain about it but it makes people quarrelsome. Moreover, Armstrong says that religion is not about believing things but behaving differently. Religious doctrines are only understood when put into practice (Armstrong, 2008). Compassion is at the center of major religious faiths around the world. This is because in compassion we overthrow ourselves from the middle of our world and we allow another person to occupy that space. Once we do away with ego, then we will be ready to see the divine. However, throughout the years, people have used religion to oppress others. This had been due to the human ego and greed. The speaker says that one of the problems today is religious illiteracy where people equate religious faith with believing things. Moreover, people today want to be religious because of the golden rule which is ‘Do to others what you want them to do to you.’ Additionally, people should move from the idea of toleration to the idea of appreciation. 2. The philosophical idea that informs the speaker’s thoughts is the Kant’s Categorical Imperative. This theory states that people should only follow ethical rules that they think should be universal. In other words, people should act based on the maxim that they wish other rational people to adhere to (Singer, 1954). The theory was formulated by Immanuel Kant. The theory of Kant is more or less similar to the Golden rule which Karen Armstrong is referring to. The Golden rule states that people should do unto others what they expect others to do unto them. She says that acting in compassion toward others is a universal law that is found in every religion globally (Armstrong, 2008). The reason for this is because compassion removes us from the 7 center of the world and places someone else there. However, acting in compassion faces various challenges such as egoism and selfishness which hinder people from the divine. She goes on to explain various contexts in different religions that place compassion as a universal law. 3 I agree with the speaker that the Golden rule is the most basic principle in almost all global religions. This Golden rule is do unto others what you expect them to do unto you. The ten commandments of the Christian bible revolve around the golden rule. Other religions such as Judaism, Islam, and Confucianism all adhere to this Golden rule. I also agree that religion is not about believing things but about behaving differently. When you practice a religious doctrine, then you understand it. The speaker also says that religion is not the cause of world wars which is true. Political differences often suck religion into it. Moreover, religious illiteracy where people equate religious faith with believing things is a challenge. This makes people misquote the scripture for their gain and use it to oppress others. I agree with the speaker’s conclusion that people need to move away from the notion of tolerance to the notion of appreciation. Appreciating people will create unity and understanding. As a result, people will act with compassion towards each other. 8 References Armstrong, K. (2008). My Wish: The Charter For Compassion [Video]. TED Conference. https://www.ted.com/talks/karen_armstrong_my_wish_the_charter_for_compassion?utm _campaign=tedspread&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=tedcomshare Chalmers, D. (2014). How Do You Explain Consciousness? [Video]. TED Conference. https://www.ted.com/talks/david_chalmers_how_do_you_explain_consciousness?utm_ca mpaign=tedspread&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=tedcomshare Conty, A. (2021). Panpsychism: A Response to the Anthropocene Age. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 35(1), 27-49. doi:10.5325/jspecphil.35.1.0027 DUSCHINSKY, R. (2012). “Tabula Rasa” and Human Nature. Philosophy, 87(342), 509-529. Pinker, S. (2003). Human Nature and The Blank Slate [Video]. TED Conference. https://www.ted.com/talks/steven_pinker_human_nature_and_the_blank_slate?utm_cam paign=tedspread&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=tedcomshare Singer, M. (1954). The Categorical Imperative. The Philosophical Review, 63(4), 577-591. doi:10.2307/2182292 Tononi, G. (2008). Consciousness as Integrated Information: A Provisional Manifesto. Biological Bulletin, 215(3), 216-242. doi:10.2307/25470707 Purchase answer to see full attachment Tags: ted talk public speaking communication skills constructive conversation Productive Disagreements User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool’s honor code & terms of service.