PLEASE READ DISCUSSION RUBRIC BEFORE YOU BEGIN WRITING. To score well on this DB, review the ASSIGNMENT DESCRIPTION & RUBRIC because it is more specific
Public Health Advocacy: Forming and Building Coalitions Although individuals and organizations can advocate on their own, coalitions are particularly effective
for public health advocacy. A coalition can include healthcare organizations, public and private sector agencies, for-profit companies, non-profit organizations, grassroots groups, academics, researchers, faith-based organizations, health departments, and health and social justice organizations. A coalition may have several different types of goals/missions, but overall, each aims to come together to agree on a solution to a specific problem that affects their constituents or members and overall improve aspects that affect health outcomes. For instance, the San Diego Tobacco Control Coalition mission is to improve and protect the health of San Diegans by promoting smoke/tobacco-free lifestyles and environments. This coalition will pursue support of policies that align with improving tobacco-free lifestyles, environments and lastly those that make the default choice the healthier choice. This discussion activity will focus on coalitions. Students will be asked to read and identify aspects of the advocacy process that coalitions participate in. Next, students will select a coalition from a prescribed list to research, identify, and describe in order to better understand function and structure.
Primary Post: Step 1: Review Chapter 17 of your textbook: Advocacy, pps. 335-346 and the corresponding chapter PowerPoint. The following sections will clarify key components of what coalitions are and how they address advocacy issues:
a. Who Can Advocate? b. Form a Coalition and Table 17.2 c. Begin Ground Softening d. Determine Who Has the Power to Make the Change Sought e. Understand the Opposition and box 17.3 f. Outline a Set of Possible Solutions
Step 2: Using the textbook, write 1-2 paragraphs describing coalitions in general:
1. What is a coalition and what members can it include/be made up of? 2. Why is including a variety of members in a coalition important? 3. What is ground-softening and why is it needed?
Step 3: Research one of the coalitions identified in the links below: Contra Costa Tobacco Prevention Coalition Coalition for a Tobacco-Free Imperial County Nevada Tobacco Control Prevention Coalition Frontline Health Workers Coalition Healthy Out of School Time Coalition Big Cities Health Coalition St. Marys County Community Alcohol Coalition National Coalition for Promoting Physical Activity Southern AIDS Coalition Lee County Injury Prevention Coalition
Idaho Coalition Against Sexual & Domestic Violence End Violence Against Women UK Coalition
https://cchealth.org/tobacco/tpc/
http://www.icphd.org/partner-resources/coalition-for-a-tobacco-free-imperial-county/
https://www.frontlinehealthworkers.org/our-mission-vision
https://www.niost.org/About/history-and-vision
https://www.bigcitieshealth.org/about-us-big-cities-health-coalition-bchc
http://www.ncppa.org/about-us
http://www.leecountyinjuryprevention.org/aboutus/coalitions/coalitions.html
https://www.endviolenceagainstwomen.org.uk/about/our-goals/
Public Health Advocacy: Forming and Building Coalitions
Step 4: Looking at the coalition you selected from the link above summarize key aspects of the coalition you selected (2-3 paragraphs):
1. What is the mission of the coalition? 2. What are the goals of the coalition? 3. List 4-5 members of the coalition 4. Brief description (1-2 sentences) of the public health problem the coalition is focusing
on 5. Review the coalition web page and tell your colleagues about what entities
(organizations, policymakers, government, industry, individuals) could be considered the opposition? This may/may not be apparent on the web page, if not, be creative an think about what is feasible.
6. Identify what could be a potential policy solution to the public health problem the coalition identifies and why (1-2 sentences).
Peer Response Posts: Review your colleagues post. Are you interested in the cause the coalition is advocating for, why or why not? Describe what policy solution you believe can improve the public health problem the coalition is focused on and why. Are you interested in joining the coalition your colleague highlighted? Why or why not?
Discussion Board Rubric – Forming and Building Coalitions
Levels of Achievement
Criteria Exceptional Acceptable Needs Improvement Missing
Primary Post
Weight 10.00%
100.00 %
1) Completed;
two or more
paragraphs. Post
is on topic, clearly
written and well-
described.
80.00 %
Completed, but less
than two
paragraphs. Post is
somewhat on topic.
Additional
description and
clarity is needed.
65.00 %
Incomplete; less than one
paragraph. Post is not on
topic and detracts from
conversation.
0.00 %
Missing
Public Health Advocacy: Forming and Building Coalitions
General Description of
Coalitions
Weight 10.00%
100.00 %
1) Thorough identification of what a coalition is. 2) Correct identification of several types of members. 3) Specific and thorough description of why including a variety of members in a coalition is very beneficial and what tool can be used to identify them. 4) Clear and thorough description of what ground- softening is and why is it needed.
85.00 %
The following are
discussed in the
response, but added
information, detail
or descriptions are
needed to support:
Identification of
what a coalition is.
Identification of a
few types of
members.
Description of why
including a variety of
members in a
coalition is very
beneficial and what
tool can be used to
identify them.
Description of what
ground-softening is
and why is it
needed.
70.00 %
Difficulty
addressing/answering the
discussion question via the
primary post. The main
aspects of the response
need improvement and
are not sufficiently
answered: Identification of
what a coalition is.
Identification of a few
types of members.
Description of why
including a variety of
members in a coalition is
very beneficial and what
tool can be used to
identify them. Description
of what ground-softening
is and why is it needed.
0.00 %
Missing or
partial
response
supplied.
Mission, Goals,
Members of Selected
Coalition
Weight 10.00%
100.00 %
1) Student
successfully
selects a coalition
from the list
provided.
2) Thorough
description and
identification of
the coalition’s
mission and
goals.
3) Five or more
coalition
85.00 %
Student successfully
selects a coalition
from the list
provided. Moderate
description and
identification of the
coalition’s mission
and goals. Three or
four coalition
members are
identified. Added
detail are needed.
70.00 %
Student has not selected a
coalition from the list
provided. Incomplete
description and
identification of the
coalition’s mission and
goals. Two or less coalition
members are identified.
0.00 %
Missing or
partial
response
supplied.
Public Health Advocacy: Forming and Building Coalitions
members are
clearly identified.
Public Health Problem;
Opposition; Possible
Policy Solution
Weight 10.00%
100.00 %
1) After review of
the selected
coalition, the
public health
problem of focus
is briefly
described.
2) A thoughtful
review and effort
of what entities
could pose as
opposition is
discussed.
3) Brief, yet clear
review of
potential policy
solution
(law/legislation)
addressing the
problem
identified by the
coalition.
85.00 %
After review of the
selected coalition,
the public health
problem of focus is
somewhat
described. A review
of what entities
could pose as
opposition is
provided, but could
be more detailed.
Somewhat clear
review of potential
policy solution
addressing the
problem identified
by the coalition.
70.00 %
Difficulty reviewing a
selected coalition. The
public health problem of
focus is not clearly
described. A review of
what entities could pose
as opposition is not
effectively provided.
Unclear review of
potential policy solution
addressing the problem
identified by the coalition.
0.00 %
Missing or
partial
response
provided.
Peer Response Post #1
Weight 15.00%
100.00 %
1) Completed; 1
or more
paragraphs.
2) Response is on
topic, clearly
written, well-
described and
adds to the
conversation
about coalitions.
3) Strong
discussion of
interest in
80.00 %
Completed; less
than 1 paragraph.
Response is
somewhat on topic.
Additional
description and
clarity is needed.
Moderate discussion
of interest in
colleagues post re:
cause/advocacy of
the coalition; policy
65.00 %
Incomplete; less than 2
sentences. Response is not
on topic and detracts from
conversation. Vague
discussion of interest in
colleagues post re:
cause/advocacy of the
coalition; policy solution;
joining the coalition, etc…
0.00 %
Missing
Public Health Advocacy: Forming and Building Coalitions
colleagues post
re:
cause/advocacy
of the coalition;
policy solution;
joining the
coalition, etc…
solution; joining the
coalition, etc…
Peer Response Post #2
Weight 15.00%
100.00 %
1) Completed; 1
or more
paragraphs.
2) Response is on
topic, clearly
written, well-
described and
adds to the
conversation
about coalitions.
3) Strong
discussion of
interest in
colleagues post
re:
cause/advocacy
of the coalition;
policy solution;
joining the
coalition, etc…
80.00 %
Additional
description and
clarity is needed.
Moderate discussion
of interest in
colleagues post re:
cause/advocacy of
the coalition; policy
solution; joining the
coalition, etc…
65.00 %
Incomplete; less than 2
sentences. Response is not
on topic and detracts from
conversation. Vague
discussion of interest in
colleagues post re:
cause/advocacy of the
coalition; policy solution;
joining the coalition, etc…
0.00 %
Missing
Spelling/Grammar/APA
Citations & References
Weight 15.00%
100.00 %
No errors
85.00 %
1-2 errors
75.00 %
3-4 errors
0.00 %
More than 4
errors or
Missing/Not
Included
Public Health Advocacy: Forming and Building Coalitions
Timeliness
Weight 15.00%
100.00 %
All three posts
are submitted by
the due date and
time.
80.00 %
All three posts are
submitted less than
24 hours past the
due date and time.
65.00 %
All three posts are
submitted more than 24
hours past the due date
and time. AND/OR one
post is submitted on time
and the other two are
more than 24 hours late.
0.00 %
Missing/All
three posts
are
submitted
48 hours
past the due
date.
Applied Sciences
Architecture and Design
Biology
Business & Finance
Chemistry
Computer Science
Geography
Geology
Education
Engineering
English
Environmental science
Spanish
Government
History
Human Resource Management
Information Systems
Law
Literature
Mathematics
Nursing
Physics
Political Science
Psychology
Reading
Science
Social Science
Liberty University
New Hampshire University
Strayer University
University Of Phoenix
Walden University
Home
Homework Answers
Blog
Archive
Tags
Reviews
Contact
twitterfacebook
Copyright © 2022 SweetStudy.comSWEETSTUDY.COM YOUR HOMEWORK ANSWERS
chat0
Home.Literature.
Help.
Log in / Sign up
PLEASE READ DISCUSSION RUBRIC BEFORE YOU BEGIN WRITING. To score well on this DB, review the ASSIGNMENT DESCRIPTION & RUBRIC because it is more specific
profile
dream86
PublicHealthAdvocacy_Coalitions.DescriptionRubric2108.pdf
Home>Biology homework help>Ecology homework help>PLEASE READ DISCUSSION RUBRIC BEFORE YOU BEGIN WRITING. To score well on this DB, review the ASSIGNMENT DESCRIPTION & RUBRIC because it is more specific
Public Health Advocacy: Forming and Building Coalitions Although individuals and organizations can advocate on their own, coalitions are particularly effective
for public health advocacy. A coalition can include healthcare organizations, public and private sector agencies, for-profit companies, non-profit organizations, grassroots groups, academics, researchers, faith-based organizations, health departments, and health and social justice organizations. A coalition may have several different types of goals/missions, but overall, each aims to come together to agree on a solution to a specific problem that affects their constituents or members and overall improve aspects that affect health outcomes. For instance, the San Diego Tobacco Control Coalition mission is to improve and protect the health of San Diegans by promoting smoke/tobacco-free lifestyles and environments. This coalition will pursue support of policies that align with improving tobacco-free lifestyles, environments and lastly those that make the default choice the healthier choice. This discussion activity will focus on coalitions. Students will be asked to read and identify aspects of the advocacy process that coalitions participate in. Next, students will select a coalition from a prescribed list to research, identify, and describe in order to better understand function and structure.
Primary Post: Step 1: Review Chapter 17 of your textbook: Advocacy, pps. 335-346 and the corresponding chapter PowerPoint. The following sections will clarify key components of what coalitions are and how they address advocacy issues:
a. Who Can Advocate? b. Form a Coalition and Table 17.2 c. Begin Ground Softening d. Determine Who Has the Power to Make the Change Sought e. Understand the Opposition and box 17.3 f. Outline a Set of Possible Solutions
Step 2: Using the textbook, write 1-2 paragraphs describing coalitions in general:
1. What is a coalition and what members can it include/be made up of? 2. Why is including a variety of members in a coalition important? 3. What is ground-softening and why is it needed?
Step 3: Research one of the coalitions identified in the links below: Contra Costa Tobacco Prevention Coalition Coalition for a Tobacco-Free Imperial County Nevada Tobacco Control Prevention Coalition Frontline Health Workers Coalition Healthy Out of School Time Coalition Big Cities Health Coalition St. Marys County Community Alcohol Coalition National Coalition for Promoting Physical Activity Southern AIDS Coalition Lee County Injury Prevention Coalition
Idaho Coalition Against Sexual & Domestic Violence End Violence Against Women UK Coalition
https://cchealth.org/tobacco/tpc/
http://www.icphd.org/partner-resources/coalition-for-a-tobacco-free-imperial-county/
https://www.frontlinehealthworkers.org/our-mission-vision
https://www.niost.org/About/history-and-vision
https://www.bigcitieshealth.org/about-us-big-cities-health-coalition-bchc
http://www.ncppa.org/about-us
http://www.leecountyinjuryprevention.org/aboutus/coalitions/coalitions.html
https://www.endviolenceagainstwomen.org.uk/about/our-goals/
Public Health Advocacy: Forming and Building Coalitions
Step 4: Looking at the coalition you selected from the link above summarize key aspects of the coalition you selected (2-3 paragraphs):
1. What is the mission of the coalition? 2. What are the goals of the coalition? 3. List 4-5 members of the coalition 4. Brief description (1-2 sentences) of the public health problem the coalition is focusing
on 5. Review the coalition web page and tell your colleagues about what entities
(organizations, policymakers, government, industry, individuals) could be considered the opposition? This may/may not be apparent on the web page, if not, be creative an think about what is feasible.
6. Identify what could be a potential policy solution to the public health problem the coalition identifies and why (1-2 sentences).
Peer Response Posts: Review your colleagues post. Are you interested in the cause the coalition is advocating for, why or why not? Describe what policy solution you believe can improve the public health problem the coalition is focused on and why. Are you interested in joining the coalition your colleague highlighted? Why or why not?
Discussion Board Rubric – Forming and Building Coalitions
Levels of Achievement
Criteria Exceptional Acceptable Needs Improvement Missing
Primary Post
Weight 10.00%
100.00 %
1) Completed;
two or more
paragraphs. Post
is on topic, clearly
written and well-
described.
80.00 %
Completed, but less
than two
paragraphs. Post is
somewhat on topic.
Additional
description and
clarity is needed.
65.00 %
Incomplete; less than one
paragraph. Post is not on
topic and detracts from
conversation.
0.00 %
Missing
Public Health Advocacy: Forming and Building Coalitions
General Description of
Coalitions
Weight 10.00%
100.00 %
1) Thorough identification of what a coalition is. 2) Correct identification of several types of members. 3) Specific and thorough description of why including a variety of members in a coalition is very beneficial and what tool can be used to identify them. 4) Clear and thorough description of what ground- softening is and why is it needed.
85.00 %
The following are
discussed in the
response, but added
information, detail
or descriptions are
needed to support:
Identification of
what a coalition is.
Identification of a
few types of
members.
Description of why
including a variety of
members in a
coalition is very
beneficial and what
tool can be used to
identify them.
Description of what
ground-softening is
and why is it
needed.
70.00 %
Difficulty
addressing/answering the
discussion question via the
primary post. The main
aspects of the response
need improvement and
are not sufficiently
answered: Identification of
what a coalition is.
Identification of a few
types of members.
Description of why
including a variety of
members in a coalition is
very beneficial and what
tool can be used to
identify them. Description
of what ground-softening
is and why is it needed.
0.00 %
Missing or
partial
response
supplied.
Mission, Goals,
Members of Selected
Coalition
Weight 10.00%
100.00 %
1) Student
successfully
selects a coalition
from the list
provided.
2) Thorough
description and
identification of
the coalition’s
mission and
goals.
3) Five or more
coalition
85.00 %
Student successfully
selects a coalition
from the list
provided. Moderate
description and
identification of the
coalition’s mission
and goals. Three or
four coalition
members are
identified. Added
detail are needed.
70.00 %
Student has not selected a
coalition from the list
provided. Incomplete
description and
identification of the
coalition’s mission and
goals. Two or less coalition
members are identified.
0.00 %
Missing or
partial
response
supplied.
Public Health Advocacy: Forming and Building Coalitions
members are
clearly identified.
Public Health Problem;
Opposition; Possible
Policy Solution
Weight 10.00%
100.00 %
1) After review of
the selected
coalition, the
public health
problem of focus
is briefly
described.
2) A thoughtful
review and effort
of what entities
could pose as
opposition is
discussed.
3) Brief, yet clear
review of
potential policy
solution
(law/legislation)
addressing the
problem
identified by the
coalition.
85.00 %
After review of the
selected coalition,
the public health
problem of focus is
somewhat
described. A review
of what entities
could pose as
opposition is
provided, but could
be more detailed.
Somewhat clear
review of potential
policy solution
addressing the
problem identified
by the coalition.
70.00 %
Difficulty reviewing a
selected coalition. The
public health problem of
focus is not clearly
described. A review of
what entities could pose
as opposition is not
effectively provided.
Unclear review of
potential policy solution
addressing the problem
identified by the coalition.
0.00 %
Missing or
partial
response
provided.
Peer Response Post #1
Weight 15.00%
100.00 %
1) Completed; 1
or more
paragraphs.
2) Response is on
topic, clearly
written, well-
described and
adds to the
conversation
about coalitions.
3) Strong
discussion of
interest in
80.00 %
Completed; less
than 1 paragraph.
Response is
somewhat on topic.
Additional
description and
clarity is needed.
Moderate discussion
of interest in
colleagues post re:
cause/advocacy of
the coalition; policy
65.00 %
Incomplete; less than 2
sentences. Response is not
on topic and detracts from
conversation. Vague
discussion of interest in
colleagues post re:
cause/advocacy of the
coalition; policy solution;
joining the coalition, etc…
0.00 %
Missing
Public Health Advocacy: Forming and Building Coalitions
colleagues post
re:
cause/advocacy
of the coalition;
policy solution;
joining the
coalition, etc…
solution; joining the
coalition, etc…
Peer Response Post #2
Weight 15.00%
100.00 %
1) Completed; 1
or more
paragraphs.
2) Response is on
topic, clearly
written, well-
described and
adds to the
conversation
about coalitions.
3) Strong
discussion of
interest in
colleagues post
re:
cause/advocacy
of the coalition;
policy solution;
joining the
coalition, etc…
80.00 %
Additional
description and
clarity is needed.
Moderate discussion
of interest in
colleagues post re:
cause/advocacy of
the coalition; policy
solution; joining the
coalition, etc…
65.00 %
Incomplete; less than 2
sentences. Response is not
on topic and detracts from
conversation. Vague
discussion of interest in
colleagues post re:
cause/advocacy of the
coalition; policy solution;
joining the coalition, etc…
0.00 %
Missing
Spelling/Grammar/APA
Citations & References
Weight 15.00%
100.00 %
No errors
85.00 %
1-2 errors
75.00 %
3-4 errors
0.00 %
More than 4
errors or
Missing/Not
Included
Public Health Advocacy: Forming and Building Coalitions
Timeliness
Weight 15.00%
100.00 %
All three posts
are submitted by
the due date and
time.
80.00 %
All three posts are
submitted less than
24 hours past the
due date and time.
65.00 %
All three posts are
submitted more than 24
hours past the due date
and time. AND/OR one
post is submitted on time
and the other two are
more than 24 hours late.
0.00 %
Missing/All
three posts
are
submitted
48 hours
past the due
date.
Applied Sciences
Architecture and Design
Biology
Business & Finance
Chemistry
Computer Science
Geography
Geology
Education
Engineering
English
Environmental science
Spanish
Government
History
Human Resource Management
Information Systems
Law
Literature
Mathematics
Nursing
Physics
Political Science
Psychology
Reading
Science
Social Science
Liberty University
New Hampshire University
Strayer University
University Of Phoenix
Walden University
Home
Homework Answers
Blog
Archive
Tags
Reviews
Contact
twitterfacebook
Copyright © 2022 SweetStudy.com
Recent Comments