Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts (on different days), who selected a dysfunction different than you did, by addressing the following questions:
How might you use the information presented by your colleague to guide and inform your professional decision-making as a forensic psychology professional?
What insights or questions do you have related to your colleagues’ post?
Note: Your responses to colleagues should be substantial (200–300 words) and supported with scholarly evidence from your research and/or the Learning Resources and properly cited in APA style. Personal anecdotes are acceptable within meaningful responses but cannot stand alone as a response. Responses should enrich the initial post by supporting and/or adding a fresh viewpoint and be constructive, enhancing the learning for all students.
Recent Comments