Class,

When comparing as contrasting the functionalist and conflict theory it is clear they have different views. The functionalist belief is that everyone’s role is important and makes sense. “Inequality, in this view, is inevitable. In no society can all roles be of equal importance. In addition, not all persons will be qualified to fill the more important positions. The functionalist theory not only posits that inequality is a built-in feature of all societies but argues that it is beneficial.”(Marger, M.(2014)) However, that conflict theory opposes that stating that, “Inequality, in this view, is neither inevitable nor functional but stems from the ability of the powerful to protect their privileges and to coerce the rest of society into accepting the stratification system.”(Marger, M.(2014)) The way way they view innequality compared to race in the United States in equally comparable.

Amanda Coughlin

Marger, M.(2014).Social Inequality: Patterns and Processes (6th Edition).social_inequality_patterns_and_processes_6e | WebViewer (gcu.edu)

Dr. Chapman and Class,

First and foremost I agree with our assigned readings explanation that sociologists have favored the conflict & functionalist theoretical perspectives in their analyses of society (Marger, 2013). However, of the two my world view aligns with the functionalist view that sees society as a relatively balanced system made up of differently functioning but interrelated parts (Marger, 2013). For example, it is known that there is stratification in our society and it is very clear that race and ethnicity play a huge role in how this plays out. E.g. throughout American history race and ethnicity have served as critical sources of social and economic division and stratification (Marger, 2013).

The functionalist view, as previously explained, sees society and social order maintained through a consensus of values among its groups and through the imperatives of functional interdependence; I.e. People generally agree on the basic rules of society, recognizing that only by abiding by such rules can they collectively survive (Marger, 2013). For the conflict theorist, society is viewed as being held together not by functional needs and broad agreements among groups, but by the power of the dominant classes and ruling elites who impose their will on society (Marger, 2013).

Both of these views can be seen operative in society. As explained earlier, I believe that when one part of society or one group within it, be it the minority or majority, black or white, Hispanic or European American, society seems to always counter. For example when it comes to race-related issues in the United States the people along with parts of government have stood up to pass legislation to ensure people are not left behind because of their race or ethnicity. On the other hand, it is the issue of leaving people behind due to their race or ethnicity that gives a glimpse into the conflict view where the minority are being coerced and made to follow the law of the land. The idea here is that those with power will abuse those without. Very stimulating question! Thoughts?

Blessings,

Francisco

References,

Marger, M. (2013). Social inequality: Patterns and processes (6th ed.). NY: McGraw-Hill