Software Quality Assurance (COMP 30010) — Spring – 2020 — CW1 (Assignment ) — All — QP ` IN SEMESTER INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT Module Code: COMP 30010 Module Name: Software Quality Assurance Level: 3 Max. Marks: 100 Instructions to Student ? Answer all questions. ? Deadline of submission: 09/06/2020 23:59 ? The marks received on the assignment will be scaled down to the actual weightage of the assignment which is 50 marks ? Formative feedback on the complete assignment draft will be provided if the draft is submitted at least 10 days before the final submission date. ? Feedback after final evaluation will be provided by 23/06/2020 Module Learning Outcomes The following LOs are achieved by the student by completing the assignment successfully 1) Select, evaluate and apply standards, tools and techniques for assuring software quality. 2) Select an appropriate test strategy and associated test data and apply relevant techniques. Assignment Objective The aim of this assignment is to evaluate student’s ability to apply the required quality standards for a project scenario. This assignment also assess the capability of student to analyze the project and to apply relevant testing techniques from the quality perspective. Assignment Tasks 1) Submit a work proposal for this assignment or before 08/05/2020 (23:59) which must include: ? Understanding of deliverables — a detail description of deliverables. (6 Marks) ? Timeline for completion of the given tasks. (2 Marks) ? Relevant literature (2 marks) The work proposal must be submitted in a word file through the link available in Moodle. MEC_AMO_TEM_035_01 Page 1 of 10 Software Quality Assurance (COMP 30010) — Spring – 2020 — CW1 (Assignment ) — All — QP 2) Assume that you are going to develop an online application to meet business objectives as given by an organization which can run on multiple platforms or can be accessible through any device. a) Outline the major components /modules of the proposed application. You can discuss each module with its purpose and associated functions (Minimum 3 modules expected). (10 marks) b) Critically discuss the necessary activities (any two) to be planned by software quality assurance team for ensuring process and product quality. Each activity to be discussed with its purpose, the relevance of proposed activity in connection with selected case and also prepare a draft plan of how this activity can be accomplished in this project. Support your argument with reference to appropriate literature. (40 marks) c) i. Prepare an algorithm/ program to accomplish a function related to any module proposed for application(expected lines of code 10-15) (10 marks) Requirements ii. Declaration of variables Valid input statements Two conditional statements Valid output statements Draw a flow graph and calculate the cyclomatic complexity for the alogorithm/program produced in task in c(i). iii. (15 marks) Briefly discuss the benefits of conducting white box testing for the proposed application. (15 marks) Rules & Regulations: ? ? ? ? All resources should be cited using CU Harvard style. The final assignment must have a Title page, Table of Contents, References/ bibliography using CU Harvard Style and page numbers. Title Page must have Assignment Name, Module name, Session, your name, ID, and the name of the faculty. Softcopy in word format is to be submitted through Turnitin link on Moodle. Guidelines: ? Assignment must be computer typed. ? Font – Times New Roman ? Font — Style – Regular ? Font – Size – 12 MEC_AMO_TEM_035_01 Page 2 of 10 Software Quality Assurance (COMP 30010) — Spring – 2020 — CW1 (Assignment ) — All — QP ? ? ? ? ? ? Heading should be with Font Size 14, Bold, Capital and Underline. Pages 10-12 Viva will be conducted after the assignment submission as per the dates informed earlier. If needed VIVA will be conducted using online tools. Explain with suitable diagrams wherever required. Diagrams must be drawn using suitable software or by pencil. Each student has to do the assignment individually / Students have to do the assignment collaboratively and each student should write a brief reflection on their contribution and learnings from group work. You can refer books in eLibrary or use internet resource. But you should not cut and paste material from internet nor provide photocopied material from books. The assignment answers should be in your own words after understanding the matter from the above resources. Important Policies to be followed 1. Student Academic Integrity Policy*: MEC upholds the spirit of academic integrity in all forms of academic work and any form of violation of academic integrity shall invite severe penalty. Any benefit obtained by indulging in the act of violation of academic integrity shall be cancelled. All cases of violation of academic integrity on the part of the student shall fall under any of the below mentioned categories: 1. Plagiarism 2. Malpractice 3. Ghost Writing 4. Collusion 5. Other cases If the student fails a module and has a proven case of academic integrity violation in this module, the student is required to re-register the module. This is applicable to first and second offenders of plagiarism. 1. Plagiarism A. First offence of plagiarism I. MEC_AMO_TEM_035_01 If a student is caught first time in an act of plagiarism during his/her course of study in any assignment other than project work, the student will be allowed to re-submit the assignment once, within a maximum period of one week. However, a penalty of deduction of 25% of the marks obtained for the resubmitted work will be imposed. Page 3 of 10 Software Quality Assurance (COMP 30010) — Spring – 2020 — CW1 (Assignment ) — All — QP II. Period of re-submission: The student will have to re-submit the work one week from the date he or she is advised to re-submit. III. If the re-submitted work is also found to be plagiarized, then that assessment will be awarded a zero mark. Re-submission of the work beyond the maximum period of one week will not be accepted and the assessment will be awarded a zero mark. B. Second offence of plagiarism If any student is caught second time in an act of plagiarism during his/her course of study (in a subsequent semester), the student will directly be awarded zero for the work in which plagiarism is detected. In such cases, the student will not be allowed to resubmit the work. A warning of suspension shall be issued, and student has to sign an undertaking and undergo counselling session in such cases. 2. Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion A. First offence of Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion If a student is caught in an act of Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion for an assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester, the student shall fail the module and shall be required to re-register the module B. Second Offence of Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion If a student is caught a second time in an act of Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion for an assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester, the student shall fail the module. A warning of suspension shall be issued, and student has to sign an undertaking and undergo counselling session in such cases. 3. Third Offence of Academic Integrity Violation If a student is caught a third time in an act of Academic Integrity Violation for an assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester (in a subsequent semester), the student shall fail the module and also shall be suspended for one semester from the College, as recommended by institutional level academic committee, Chaired by the Associate Dean, Academic Affairs. 4. Fourth Offence of Academic Integrity Violation: If a student is caught a fourth time in an act of Academic Integrity Violation for an assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester (in a subsequent semester), the student shall fail the module and also shall be expelled from the College, as recommended by institutional level academic committee, Chaired by the Associate Dean, Academic Affairs. 5. Other cases If a student commits an act of academic integrity violation as per the definition of ‘other cases mentioned in the previous section or of a different nature, student’s case shall be forwarded to an institutional level academic committee, Chaired by the Associate Dean, Academic Affairs. The MEC_AMO_TEM_035_01 Page 4 of 10 Software Quality Assurance (COMP 30010) — Spring – 2020 — CW1 (Assignment ) — All — QP committee shall investigate the case by means of a viva and/or a disciplinary hearing and shall take appropriate decision. The penalty that can be granted to a proven case of academic integrity violation which falls in this category of ‘other cases can be a warning/component zero/ module fail/suspension/expulsion depending on the nature and gravity of the offence. 6. Types/Variations of Cases: I. II. III. IV. If plagiarism is detected in any component of one assessment, the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole assessment, even if only the component or part submission alone needs to be resubmitted. If plagiarism is detected in a group assessment, all students of the group will be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism and the policy will then be applied to all students If plagiarism is detected in any component of a group assessment, the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole assessment even if only the component or part submission alone needs to be resubmitted. All students of the group would be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism and the policy will then be applied to all the students of the group. If the assessment consists of components or part submissions that could be a group assessment component (e.g. group assignment) and an individual assessment component (e.g. individual reflection), the following will be applicable: a. If plagiarism is detected in the group assessment component, all students of the group will be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism, The policy will then be applied to all students of the group. Group assessment component will be resubmitted as per the policy. b. If plagiarism is detected in the individual assessment component, the individual assessment component will be resubmitted and the policy will then be applied to that student alone. c. For both (a) and/or (b), the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole assessment. * for further details Refer to MEC Student Academic Integrity Policy in Student Handbook. 2. Late Submission Regulations: It is the students’ responsibility to check all relevant timelines related to assessments. As per the Assessment Policy at MEC, late submissions are allowed for one week (5 working days) for all UG modules with a penalty. In such cases, a deduction of 5% of the marks obtained for the submitted work shall be imposed for each working day following the last date of submission till the date of actual submission. Assessment documents submitted beyond a period of one week (5 working days) after the last date of submission will not be accepted and will be awarded a zero for that assessment. In cases where the submission has been delayed due to extenuating circumstances, the student may be permitted to submit the work without imposing the late submission policy stated above. The extended period of submission will be one week from the original last date of submission. In such cases, the student is expected to submit the supporting MEC_AMO_TEM_035_01 Page 5 of 10 Software Quality Assurance (COMP 30010) — Spring – 2020 — CW1 (Assignment ) — All — QP certificates on or before the original last date of submission of the assessment and the decision of extension rests with faculty responsible for the assessment .The late submission policy shall be applied if the student fails to submit the work within one week of the original last date of submission. Students may contact their teachers for clarification on specific details of the submission time if required. 3. Research Ethics and Biosafety Policy To protect and respect the rights, dignity, health, safety, and privacy of research subjects involved including the welfare of animals and the integrity of environment, all student projects are expected to be undertaken as per the MEC Research Ethics and Biosafety Policy. Accordingly the following shall apply. ? Research and other enterprise activities shall be conducted by maintaining the high ethical standards consistent with national and international standards and conventions. ? Any research at MEC that is categorized as high-risk research shall be subject to review and approval by the Research Ethics and Biosafety Committee. ? Research activities involving collection of human or animal tissues and manipulation of microbial, animal or plant cells shall be subject to review and approval by the Research Ethics and Biosafety Committee. ? Participants involved in research must be informed about the purpose of research and intended uses of research findings. Written consent must be obtained from people involved prior to the commencement of research. ? Data obtained from participants must be treated with high confidence and should be used only for the intended purpose of research. Assessment Evaluation Criteria Classification And % Range Outstanding Excellent MEC_AMO_TEM_035_01 Reflection and critical analysis. Highly competent analytical skills and reflective practice, demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required professional values and principles and professional development planning. Strong analytical skills and reflective practice used, demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required professional values, principles and competencies and Knowledge and Understanding/ Application of Theory Extensive knowledge and depth of understanding of principles and concepts and /or outstanding application of theory in practice. Excellent knowledge and understanding of principles and concepts and /or excellent knowledge and understanding of the application of theory in practice Evidence of Reading Referencing and Bibliography Presentation, Grammar and Spelling Evidence of reading an extensive range of educational literature/research and where applicable workplace strategies, policies and procedures. Accurate referencing and bibliography correctly using appropriate referencing style Excellent presentation, logically structured, using correct grammar and spelling, excellent crossreferencing and links to supporting evidence Evidence of reading a wide range of educational literature/research and where applicable, workplace strategies, policies and procedures. Appropriate referencing and bibliography correctly using appropriate referencing style Good presentation, competently structured, using correct grammar and spelling, clear and easy to use links to supporting evidence Page 6 of 10 Software Quality Assurance (COMP 30010) — Spring – 2020 — CW1 (Assignment ) — All — QP Very Good Quality Good (Acceptable) Adequate/ Satisfactory Weak /Poor (all learning outcomes not adequately met) MEC_AMO_TEM_035_01 professional development planning. Good use of analytical skills and reflective practice demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required professional values, principles and competencies and professional development planning. Acceptable use of analytical skills and reflective practice demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required professional values, principles and competencies and professional development planning. Adequate use of analytical skills and reflective practice demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required professional values, principles and competencies and professional development planning. Little use of analytical skills and reflective practice demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required competencies and/or professional development planning. Professional values and principles not reflected in the submission. and/or Insufficient/no use of analytical skills and reflective practice demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required competencies and professional development planning Good knowledge or key principles and concepts and/or good knowledge of the application of theory in practice Evidence of reading a good range of educational literature/research and where applicable workplace strategies, policies and procedures. Generally well referenced with correct use of the appropriate referencing style Reasonable presentation, completely structured, acceptable grammar and spelling, acceptable links to supporting evidence Acceptable knowledge of key principles and concepts and/or knowledge of the application of theory in practice Evidence of reading an appropriate range of educational literature/research and where applicable, relevant workplace policies and procedures Adequate referencing. Generally accurate use of appropriate referencing style Adequate presentation and structure, acceptable grammar and spelling, adequate links to supporting evidence Adequate knowledge of key principles and concepts and/or satisfactory evidence of the application of theory in practice. Evidence of minimal reading of educational literature/research and where applicable relevant workplace policies and procedures Adequate referencing. Appropriate referencing style used but may contain some inaccuracies. Weak presentation , satisfactory structure, grammar and spelling, links to supporting evidence Little evidence of knowledge of key principles or concepts and/or little evidence of the application of theory in practice Little or no evidence of reading outside of the course textbook and/or reference to relevant work place policies and procedures Little or no referencing, incorrect style, or very inaccurate use of appropriate referencing style Poor presentation, grammar and spelling, links to supporting evidence and/or and/or No evidence of knowledge of key principles or concepts and/or no evidence of application of theory in practice No evidence of reading outside of the course textbook and/or reference to relevant workplace policies and procedures and/or Unacceptable presentation, grammar and spelling, structure is very poor, links to supporting evidence Page 7 of 10 Software Quality Assurance (COMP 30010) — Spring – 2020 — CW1 (Assignment ) — All — QP Task based Evaluation Grid /COMP 30010-Assignment 1 Delive rables 0-3 Task 1 Proposal shows poor understanding of assignment tasks .All deliverables stated inaccurately. Delive rables Task 2(a) 0-2 Delive rables Task 2(b) Incomplete module level structure. Lack of discussion on associated functions of module. 8-10 Partially correct proposal with most of the deliverables are identified with lack of clarity in minor areas. Most of the resources are stated appropriately with proper work plan. 3-5 Excellent discussion of deliverables with high level of accuracy. Credibility of the research sources are established. Excellent work plan with proper timeline of high level tasks and lower level tasks Few relevant modules identified supported with associated functions. Most of the modules are analyzed properly. Clear set of functions mapped to achieve the business objectives. 26 -36 Complete and accurate analysis of modules with key functions mapped to business objectives. Able to establish the significance of all stated module/functions Relevant activities are identified and discussed mapped to software quality assurance framework. Clear set of steps are outlined to accomplish the task with Excellent analysis on software quality assurance activities mapped to project objectives which exhibits extensive knowledge and depth of understanding of quality concepts. Detailed framework produced in accomplishing the task with high level of accuracy supported with relevant literature. 0-10 11-25 Activities identified are not mapped to software quality assurance framework. Partially correct discussion on activities with some steps to be followed to execute the task. Lack of supporting literature. MEC_AMO_TEM_035_01 Mark 4-7 6-7 8 -10 37-40 Mark Mark Page 8 of 10 Software Quality Assurance (COMP 30010) — Spring – 2020 — CW1 (Assignment ) — All — QP supporting literature. Minor inconsistencie s observed in stating the relevance of the selected activity in line with project scenario 6-8 9 -10 Delive rables Task 2(c)i 0-2 3-5 Wrong program Mostly Correct program with clear set of correct statements and logical structure. statements Well mapped to the objectives. .Minor inconsistencie s observed in program logic Delive rables Task 2(c ) ii 0-4 Partially correct program with few incorrect statements mapped to objectives. Some inconsistencies observed in program logic 5-8 9-12 13 -15 Partially correct graph. Few edges and nodes are illustrated appropriately. Observed inconsistencies in major areas of program. Accurate graph in terms of logic and connectivity between nodes. Correct value derived from the formulae. 5-8 Most of the edges and nodes are structured properly. Minor inconsistencie s observed in logical structure. Correct formulae applied for cyclomatic complexity. 9-12 Partially correct discussion on white box testing. Purpose is stated but lack of justification in comparison with Significance of white box testing is illustrated . Clear set of steps are outlined to Excellent analysis on white box testing mapped to project objectives which exhibits extensive knowledge and depth of understanding of testing concepts. Detailed discussion on its significance with high level of Wrong flow graph Delive 0-4 rables Task Incomplete discussion 2(c ) iii on white box testing MEC_AMO_TEM_035_01 13 -15 Mark Mark Mark Page 9 of 10 Software Quality Assurance (COMP 30010) — Spring – 2020 — CW1 (Assignment ) — All — QP proposed application. accomplish accuracy supported with relevant the testing literature. successfully. Minor inconsistencie s observed in stating the relevance of the selected activity in line with project scenario. Total marks Student ID: Penalty Student Name: Final Marks Assignment evaluation Grid MEC_AMO_TEM_035_01 Page 10 of 10 Purchase answer to see full attachment Explanation & Answer: 12 pages Tags: software quality assurance User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool’s honor code & terms of service.
COMP 30010 CBFS Software Quality Assurance Paper
Jun 23, 2023 | Communication | 0 comments
Our Service Charter
1. Professional & Expert Writers: Homework Free only hires the best. Our writers are specially selected and recruited, after which they undergo further training to perfect their skills for specialization purposes. Moreover, our writers are holders of masters and Ph.D. degrees. They have impressive academic records, besides being native English speakers.
2. Top Quality Papers: Our customers are always guaranteed of papers that exceed their expectations. All our writers have +5 years of experience. This implies that all papers are written by individuals who are experts in their fields. In addition, the quality team reviews all the papers before sending them to the customers.
3. Plagiarism-Free Papers: All papers provided by Homework Free are written from scratch. Appropriate referencing and citation of key information are followed. Plagiarism checkers are used by the Quality assurance team and our editors just to double-check that there are no instances of plagiarism.
4. Timely Delivery: Time wasted is equivalent to a failed dedication and commitment. Homework Free is known for timely delivery of any pending customer orders. Customers are well informed of the progress of their papers to ensure they keep track of what the writer is providing before the final draft is sent for grading.
5. Affordable Prices: Our prices are fairly structured to fit in all groups. Any customer willing to place their assignments with us can do so at very affordable prices. In addition, our customers enjoy regular discounts and bonuses.
6. 24/7 Customer Support: At Homework Free, we have put in place a team of experts who answer to all customer inquiries promptly. The best part is the ever-availability of the team. Customers can make inquiries anytime.
Recent Posts
Archives
- August 2024
- July 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- January 2023
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- February 2018
- January 2018
Categories
- `
- .uul l illl'
- "" ""Qualitative Analysis Assignment: Transcript 3
- "" which is attached to this assignment.
- { ""cell_type"": ""markdown""
- /files/-np-ex19-7b-xlsx
- /files/0886109913504154-pdf,/files/1363460706065057-pdf,/files/0886109914560741-pdf
- /files/20191118150623part-vii-assessment-tool-development-rub1-pdf
- /files/20191119051422iom-report-future-of-nursing-rubric-xlsx
- /files/20200428035024defend-or-refute-guide-pdf
- /files/adjustmentdisorder-pdf,/files/depression1-pdf-6973733
- /files/assignment1j-docx-7815535,/files/assignment2j-docx
- /files/assignment2-docx-8830717
- /files/bookchap1-412-pdf,/files/bookchap1-412-pdf-7977187
- /files/businessculturaldimensionsanalysisgradingrubric-pdf-7789673"
- /files/chapter5-pdf-7822037
- /files/crjs3001wk1studentreplies-docx
- /files/developingobjectives1-docx,/files/article3assignments3-41-pdf,/files/developingobjectives1-docx-7919359
- /files/discussionreflectionguide-docx,/files/introduction-to-criminology-10th-edition-9781544339023-pdf,/files/sample-docx-7598097
- /files/essay2-documentedargumentrevised22-pdf-6947741
- /files/frenchandindianwar-docx-7926377,/files/bostonteapartyaftermath-docx
- /files/homework2negotiationmorgan-docx,/files/homeworknegotiation1michele-docx
- /files/labassignmnetw8-docx-7665133
- /files/lessonweek4-docx
- /files/mat240houselistingpricebyregionpjct5-xlsx-7794861,/files/mat240modulefiveassignmenttemplatepjct5-docx-7794863
- /files/microm53question-docx
- /files/milecture-pdf,/files/motivationalinterviewing-thebmj-pdf
- /files/nrnpprac6635comprehensivepsychiatricevaluationtemplate-docx-8263023"
- /files/principlesofcorporatefinance13erichardbrealey-pdf-7629311,/files/wk71-docx,/files/wk72-docx,/files/wk73-docx,/files/wk74-docx
- /files/problemstatementchecklist-pdf-6967979,/files/week4article-pdf-6967981
- /files/reflectionpaperguidelines-docx-7570139
- /files/rubricpandv-pdf-7584061,/files/page11-pdf-7584063,/files/page9-10-pdf-7584065,/files/implicationofpiagetsandvygotskytheories-summer2021socialstudiesmethodsforece-fieldece-3571-01-pdf
- /files/screenshot2021-02-27at11-35-38am-png"
- /files/sec-516-t6-meetingtheneedsofdiverselearners-docx"
- /files/spd-400-d-t6-studentgoalsandinterventionplantemplate-docx-7938583,/files/rub-docx-7938623
- /files/taskdifficultyandincubation1-docx
- /files/unitvinternationlstudyguide-pdf-7796117
- /files/visualcommunicationassessment23051-docx
- /files/week3assignmentg-docx
- /files/week4rubric-docx-7856191
- /files/week7readingdestructivebehavior-pdf-7890761,/files/bibliu-print-9781452236315table143-pdf
- /files/westernphilosophyananthologybycottinghamjohnz-lib-org-pdf"
- /files/woodch9-pdf,/files/chapter8-pdf-6111751
- /files/youthexposedtoviolenceindc-august2021-docx,/files/chapteronethenatureandtoolsofresearch-pdf
- ~I'vcrn I""theorems"" follow from it
- 1111 writing and reading is embedded in some Discourse
- 12 font
- 12 point font
- 2014
- 2015
- 2021
- 2021). HTML pages are an excellent example that allows network shares hence makes the embedding of the resources possible. Therefore
- 300 words essayFor this post, discuss: What is the relationship between marriage, monogamy, and power? Please reference the Spade article in your post.
- 3000 words 5 primary research studies The topic is cross-linguistic influence on L2 grammar using mixed method
- 4)."
- 50-60 word response each chapter. basically what your thoughts.
- 800 words on thesis statement below. Thesis: Once COVID 19 is contained, transportation development is the single most important requirement to fixing the economy.
- a U.S. computer parts manufacturer
- Ab104
- Accounting & Finance
- acquire (at least) one initial Discourse. This initial Discourse
- actively engaging with course materials
- acts
- adding beliefs
- Afroamer Hist
- Ahs6640
- allocating specific time slots for coursework
- American Military University
- analyze and evaluate the following questions:
- and academic grammar and usage.
- and architecture the guys work execution at the program or system level. At the risk of falling victim to stating the obvious
- and cite and reference your sources to avoid plagiarism."
- and external resources recommended by instructors. Utilize online libraries
- and interactive components. Take comprehensive notes
- and managing your time effectively
- and often write
- and personal health record (PHR)
- and related terms for two separate concepts. (examples: technology-computer
- and Transportation and Telecommunication. Using The World Factbook
- and users are able to inject SQL commands using the available input (Imperva
- Applied Science
- Applied Sciences
- Architecture and Design
- Art
- Arts
- as opposed to a subjective
- Ashford University
- asking thoughtful questions and providing constructive feedback to your peers. Regularly check your course emails and notifications
- assignments
- at least
- Attend a live concert or watch a recorded concert and write a 2-3 page paper discussing the performance.
- attitudes
- Auburn University
- BA207
- Bachelor Of Applied Social Science
- before it is implemented or after. Models to implement change (The Lewin model
- Bethel University
- beyond the family and immediate kin and peer group. These may be 1111.
- Bhr 3352
- Bib355
- Binghamton University
- Biology
- Biology – Anatomy
- Biology – Ecology
- Biology – Physiology
- Bls221
- body
- Bos4025
- Boston University
- Bowie State University
- brings with it the (poten- u.il) acquisition of social ""goods"" (money
- Brookhaven College
- Budgeted Balance Sheet Variance Analysis Capital Budgeting Scorecard Matching
- Bumg2017
- Bus 119
- Bus623
- Busi 511
- Business
- Business – Management
- Business & Finance
- Business & Finance – Financial markets
- Business & Finance – Marketing
- Business & Finance – Supply Chain Management
- Business and Finance
- Business Finance – Accounting
- Business Finance – Economics
- Business Finance – Management
- Business Finance – Operations Management
- but at least 80% of the required information has been included in the paper(4.125)Excel file has not been embedded correctly
- but not be limited to
- by Pierre LemieuxAfter the economists' analytical assault
- Ca499
- California State University Fullerton
- can be studied
- can never 21 really be liberating literacies. For a literacy to be liberating it must contain both the Discourse it is going to critique and a set of meta-elements (language
- CATEGORY
- Chapman University
- Chapter 3
- Chemistry
- Chemistry – Chemical Engineering
- Chemistry – Organic chemistry
- Chemistry – Pharmacology
- Chemistry – Physical chemistry
- Cis650
- CISY2320
- Cj130
- Cjs 221
- Clayton State University
- CMGT 580
- Cod
- Collaborative Innovation Strategy
- College Of The Canyons
- Colorado Christian University
- Colorado State University
- Columbia College
- Columbia Southern University
- Com 230
- COM-FP3200
- Comm104
- Communication
- Computer Science
- Computer Science- Python
- Concordia University
- correctness
- cross-site scripting
- Cs330
- culturally appropriate intervention to address childhood obesity in a low-income African American community.
- Cuyamaca College
- Decision Making Problem Solving
- defensive programming allows for more efficient processes while also protecting systems from attack.
- Depaul University
- describe how children acquire
- Discuss how cloud computing has changed how companies budget for software solutions APA formatting No plagiarism References required 250 to 300 words
- Discuss: Why is it critical for company managers to have a clear strategic vision regarding their organization?
- Dmm613
- each time a user extracts the ZIP file
- Earth Science – Geography
- Earth Science – Geology
- Ece 312
- Ecom301
- Economic math exercise Exercise 15.1 3 Exercise 15.3 1-6 Exercise 15.4 1, 2 Exercise 15.5 1-4 Exercise 15.6 1-3
- Economics
- Economics For Managers
- Edit 2 pages on marketing essentials
- Education
- elasticity
- Embry Riddle
- Emglish
- En206
- Eng 100
- Eng-106
- Eng225
- ENGH302
- Engineering
- Engineering – Chemical Engineering
- Engineering – Civil Engineering
- Engineering – Electrical Engineering
- Engineering – Electronic Engineering
- Engineering – Mechanical Engineering
- Engineering – Software
- Engineering – Telecommunications Engineering
- Engl311
- English
- English – Article writing
- English – Literature
- English 361
- ensuring you allocate dedicated time for coursework
- Environmental science
- especially for a small company
- etc¦). Please note at least five organizational activities and be specific when responding.
- Excelsior College
- Executive summary on a business idea
- February 20). What is defensive programming? EasyTechJunkie. Retrieved December 30
- Film Industry
- Fin 500
- Florida Gateway College
- Florida International University
- Follow the guidelines of the critique assignment in the document and write a critique for the link given in another file.
- Foreign Languages – Spanish
- from https://www.pcmag.com/news/fat32-vs-ntfs-choose-your-own-format
- Geb3213
- Geography
- Geol100
- George Brown College
- Government
- Grand Canyon University
- Grantham
- Grantham University
- Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District
- GU299
- He 553
- he focused on aspects of the U.S. that combined democratic and increasingly capitalist characteristics. THINK ABOUT the points De Tocqueville made.
- Healthcare
- Hi225
- Hillsborough Community College
- Him301
- His 202
- Hist1122
- Hist2020
- History
- History – American history
- History – Ancient history
- History – World history
- HLS3302
- HLTH 642
- How can one distinguish between an organizational weakness and a threat to the organization? 250 words
- HRMT 603
- Hsl2301
- Hst 300
- HUM 301
- Hum420
- Human Resource
- Human Resource Management
- Humanities
- I need a one paragraph speech to convince anybody to hire me at his/her company. It is an assignment not in real life. The goal is to show how good you can convince someone.
- i need the attached work to look like this. please redo and make it look like this.
- I need the presentation (power point) to include all the information written in the essay and I need it in 5 hours. The power point has to include EVERYTHING so minimum 6 slides
- I'm taking Ethics and Moral Reasoning and would like someone to write my final paper.
- Ibsu487
- Identify and describe the two significant criticism of Wikipedia?
- identify the leadership theory that best aligns with your personal leadership style
- if you suggest trying to do this
- Iii Mlch
- III nuistery of such superficialities was meant to
- In 750 Words Review and critique the Journal of Neuroscience article provided to you in a style accessible to a non-expert readership.
- in any other way
- In the list below, what natural disaster do you think is sustainable or not? Why? 1. Agriculture 2. Fishing 3. Oil and gas 4. Forestry 5. Mining
- indeed
- Indiana University Bloomington
- Industrial Technical College
- Information Systems
- INFS519
- Introduction To Analytics
- Introduction To Philosopy
- It490
- John Ruskin
- Just need to write 2 and half pages and Annotated Bibliography on gun control
- Law
- Law – Civil
- Law – Criminal
- Law2001
- Law710
- Ldr600
- lecture slides
- Legal Regulations Compliance And Investigation
- Letourneau University
- Liberty University
- lIlgll.Igt· (1II1In·d
- Lit 2000
- literacy is always plural: literacies (there are many of them
- Literature
- Logistic Management For Disasters
- Ma105
- Ma225
- Mana 3300060
- Math144
- Mathematics
- Mathematics – Algebra
- Mathematics – Calculus
- Mathematics – Geometry
- Mathematics – Numerical analysis
- Mathematics – Precalculus
- Mathematics – Probability
- Mathematics – Statistics
- Mathematics – Trigonometry
- Matu203
- Mba5401
- Media
- Mgmt 615
- Mgt201
- Mgt211
- Mgt630
- Mgt660
- Middle East College
- MMHA6500
- Mmpa 6910
- Mod445596Id
- Montclair State University
- Music1407
- no workable ""affirmative action"" for Discourses: you can't 19 Ill' let into the game after missing the apprenticeship and be expected to have a fnir shot at playing it. Social groups will not
- not writing)
- Nsg416
- Nsg451
- NSG6102
- Nurs 6051
- Nursing
- offering learners the flexibility to acquire new skills and knowledge from the comfort of their homes. However
- Operation Security
- or do those companies have an ethical obligation to protect people? In this assignment
- Organizational Behavior Principles
- Other
- Park University
- Partnership And Corporate Taxation
- paying attention to grammar and spelling. Actively participate in discussions
- Persuasion And Social Movements
- Phil 112
- Philosophy
- Philosophy 127B
- Physics
- Physics – Astronomy
- Physics – Electromagnetism
- Physics – Geophysics
- Physics – Mechanics
- Physics – Optics
- Pm598
- Political Science
- PowerPoint slides
- Principles Of Business Management
- Programming
- Project Management
- provide a discussion on what could have been done better to minimize the risk of failure. If you have not yet been involved with a business process redesign
- Psy3380
- Psy570
- Psych620
- Psych635 Psychology Of Learning
- Psychology
- Purdue Global University
- Purdue University
- Q1: Discuss how globalization has changed jobs in an organization where you have worked. What are some HR responses to those changes? Q2: How would you describe the schools of ethical thought?
- Read The CEO of Starbucks and the Practice of Ethical Leadership and complete the questions at the end of the case study.
- Reading
- readings
- Regent University
- Religion
- Research, identify, and briefly describe the evolution of information systems infrastructure. Need minimum 300 words or more with minimum 2 references in APA format
- Rsch8460
- RWS280
- safety statutes
- Saudi Electronic University
- Savannah State University
- Science
- self-actualization
- several things can happen
- so that it is not biased?
- so too
- Soc121
- Soc201
- Social Science
- Social Science – Philosophy
- Social Science – Sociology
- Social Sciences
- Sociology
- someone cannot engage in a Discourse in a less than fully fluent manner. You are either in it or you're not. Discourses are connected with displays of
- South University
- South University Online
- Southeastern University
- Southern New Hampshire University
- Southwestern College
- Sp001
- St. Petersburg College
- State Center Community College District
- Statistics
- succeeding in online courses requires a different approach compared to traditional classroom settings. To help you make the most of your online learning experience
- such as notifications from social media or email. Organize your study materials and have a reliable internet connection to ensure seamless access to course materials.
- System Engineering
- Tarrant Country College
- Texas Am University
- that personal ethics and organizations ethics are two different and unrelated concepts. Others
- the attribute is useful
- The budget is arguably the most important policy decision elected officials make. Why?
- The directions are attached. However you must read the PDF file first in order to answer the questions.
- the project requires 6 inches of pavement thickness if the unit weight of the product is equal to 145 lbs per cubic foot. Using this information
- the psychiatrist stated that Charles was not suicidal and diagnoses him with antisocial personality disorder.(Learning Objectives: 1
- the role of work and money
- Theology
- think about a team you currently work with or have worked with in the past and how well this team has functioned. Think about both the positives and the negatives
- Thomas Nelson Community College
- Tim8330
- to be true of second language acquisition or socially situ ated cognition (Beebe
- to better promote the value and dignity of individuals or groups and to serve others in ways that promote human flourishing.
- to usc a Discourse. The most you can do is III It'! them practice being a linguist with you.
- Touro College Of Los Angeles
- Trident University International
- Troy University
- Uncategorized
- University Of California Santa Cruz
- University Of Cumberlands
- University Of Maryland University College
- University Of Nevada – Las Vegas
- University Of South Carolina
- University Of South Florida
- University Of The Cumberlands
- University Of Virginia
- University Of West Florida
- Unlv
- Walden University
- we can always ask about how much ten- 12 """""" or conflict is present between any two of a person's Discourses (Rosaldo
- West Valley College
- West Virginia University
- Western New England University
- What does Kolbert mean when she writes, "It seemed to me, as a journalist, that the magazine had buried the lede? According to Kolbert, what should the lede be?
- whether good or bad. The intent of the short research projects is to dig a little deeper into some of the topics
- which triggers the vulnerability. As soon as the user downloads this shortcut file on Windows 10; windows explorer will
- Why do you want to become a Physical Therapist Assistant? Why should you be accepted into the PTA program?
- working together
- Write a 150 response that focus on the the role of the observer in making images of the universe.
- Write a 500 to 750 word essay using narration as the chief method of development.
- Write a paper based on a movie that is discussing a psychological disorder
- Write an essay on artificial intelligence in eCommerce and business. Min of 3000 words No plagiarism
- Write an essay on derivatives trading
- Writing
- Ych635 Psychology Of Learning
- you believe you can provide the CIO with the information he needs.
- you will learn how to search for scholarly
Search
Tags
Homework Free Org
Your one stop solution for all your online studies solutions. Hire some of the world's highly rated writers to handle your writing assignments. And guess what, you don't have to break the bank.
© 2020 Homework Free Org
SERVICES OFFERED
Recent Comments