Towards a Conceptual Framework  
In this module you have examined the different types of change management frameworks. Now read, Rethinking organizational change: Towards a conceptual framework from the required reading list. This study proposes a conceptual framework incorporating the macro environment (industry-level changes) with organization-level changes to help practitioners build a more balanced approach to change management. 
With this approach, consider the macro environment of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. 
Discuss the six models of managing change and which you think would work best in the KSA business environment and why?
Now consider an industry-level application based on a company in an industry that you are familiar with in the Kingdom.
Provide an overview of the company and share information about the organization’s mission, vision, values, industry, etc. 
How could a macro level approach to change management, as offered by the authors, benefit this company?

Which of the six models would you use to support this macro/micro level analysis?
Critical Thinking Writing Rubric (100)
Requirements
Content
Analysis
Sources
Demonstrates
college-level
proficiency in
organization,
grammar and
style.
Exceeds Expectation
21-25 Points
Includes all of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
21-25 Points
Demonstrates
substantial and
extensive knowledge
of the materials,
with no errors or
major omissions.
25-30 Points
Provides strong
thought, insight, and
analysis of concepts
and applications.
13-15 Points
Sources go above
and beyond required
criteria and are well
chosen to provide
effective substance
and perspectives on
the issue under
examination.
5 Points
Project is clearly
organized, well
written, and in
proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Strong
sentence and
paragraph structure,
contains no errors in
grammar, spelling,
APA style, or APA
citations and
references.
Total points possible = 100
Meets Expectation
16-20 Points
Includes most of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
16-20 Points
Demonstrates
adequate knowledge
of the materials;
may include some
minor errors or
omissions.
19-24 Points
Provides adequate
thought, insight, and
analysis of concepts
and applications.
10-12 Points
Sources meet
required criteria and
are adequately
chosen to provide
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.
4 Points
Project is fairly well
organized and
written and is in
proper format as
outlined in the
assignment.
Reasonably good
sentence and
paragraph structure,
may include a few
minor errors in
grammar, spelling,
APA style, or APA
citations and
references.
Below Expectation
11-15 Points
Includes some of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
11-15 Points
Demonstrates fair
knowledge of the
materials and/or
includes some major
errors or omissions.
Limited Evidence
6-10 Points
Includes few of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
6-10 Points
Fails to demonstrate
knowledge of the
materials and/or
includes many major
errors or omissions.
13-18 Points
Provides poor
thought, insight, and
analysis of concepts
and applications.
7-9 Points
Sources meet
required criteria but
are poorly chosen to
provide substance
and perspectives on
the issue under
examination.
7-12 Points
Provides little or no
thought, insight, and
analysis of concepts
and applications.
4-6 Points
Source selection and
integration of
knowledge from the
course is clearly
deficient.
3 Points
Project is poorly
organized and
written and may not
follow proper format
as outlined in the
assignment.
Inconsistent to
inadequate sentence
and paragraph
development,
and/or includes
numerous or major
errors in grammar,
spelling, APA style or
APA citations and
references.
1-2 Points
Project is not
organized or well
written and is not in
proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Poor
quality work;
unacceptable in
terms of grammar,
spelling, APA style,
and APA citations
and references.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment