BUS 428: TAMUC Software Consultants

BUS 428: TAMUC Software Consultants

Oct 13, 2022 | Business Finance - Operations Management | 0 comments

BUS 428: TAMUC Software Consultants

Software Project Team (YOU): TAMUC Software Consultants

Customer: Lear Jet Avionics Division

RFP awarded for specific message services which will be incorporated into an electronic instrument company (Lear Jet Avionics ) interface to electronic gauges. Topical level requirements for the software were provided. Deliverable products include:

– Systems Engineering to provide appropriate requirements decomposition

– Software Engineering to provide design/development/unit test of software

– System Test Engineering to provide component and enterprise level testing

– Quality Engineering to provide quality control through the entire development life

cycle

– Management functions to include all primary functions (project management,

finance, planning & scheduling, Overhead support (contracts, engineering matrix, etc.)

Award date of May 15 and required completion date (deliverables provided) of November 15.

Lear Jet Avionics request of planned deliverables, acceptance criteria, quality plan, and work breakdown structure. These items need to be provided in an acceptable time for Lear Jet to review and approve.

Lear Jet Avionics further requests other deliverables to include final software (source and binary) which meets all approved acceptance criteria, associated design documents (system and development level)

All project questions or request for project scope changes should be directed to the Lear Jet Avionics designee (course instructor).

There is no requirement relative to project tools used to generate the required data. Topical requirements include:

– System Engineering: UML design artifacts for graphic widgets to display aeronautical expanse gauges for interface testing within the technical specs guidelines for twenty-five different visual aspects. Include appropriate level of peer review. Design should include graphical mock-up of gauges.

· – System Engineering: Derive component level requirements for Software Engineering to design, code, and unit test and System Test can provide System and Enterprise level testing

· – Software Engineering: Provide appropriate level design artifacts from System Engineering UML design artifacts. Include appropriate level of peer review.

· – Software Engineering: Code and Unit Test software modules that execute the software which meets all topical and derived requirements

· – System Test Engineering: Derive sell-off acceptance criteria. Include appropriate peer review (including System Engineering) and customer approval.

· – System Test Engineering: Derive System and Enterprise Level Test Cases. Include appropriate level of peer review.

· – System Test Engineering: Execute test cases as software modules become available

· – Quality Engineering: Provide quality checks during the processes described for System Engineering, Software Engineering, and System Test Engineering as appropriate

· – Include the following customer related reviews: Design Review (after System Engineering completes design artifacts), Pre-Ship Review (provided prior to Lear Jet Avionics acceptance of software), and Final Acceptance Test (software demonstration at customer facility showing software meets all requirements as installed)

Approved labor rates ($/hr.) as follows:

· – System Engineer I: 43.15

· – System Engineer II: 44.37

· – System Engineer III: 52.17

· – Lead System Engineer: 56.93

· – Software Engineer I: 42.38

· – Software Engineer II: 48.61

· – Software Engineer III: 55.01

· – Lead Software Engineer: 60.76

· – System Test Engineer I: 44.76

· – System Test Engineer II: 43.62

· – System Test Engineer III: 48.25

· – Lead System Test Engineer: 63.21

· – Quality Engineer I: 43.38

· – Quality Engineer II: 47.54

· – Quality Engineer III: 55.11

· – Lead Quality Engineer: 60.89

· – Project Manager: 96.52 (LOE Level of Effort)

· – Chief Engineer: 76.41 (LOE Level of Effort)

Approved overhead rates as follows:

· – Finance: 6.5% of total hours

· – Planning & Scheduling: 5.2% of total hours

· – Management (Contracts/Senior Management): 2.3% of total hours

· – Facility: 1.7% of total hours

· – HR/Staffing: 0.61% of total hours

ACTIVITY / TASK LIST BY LOWEST WBS LEVEL LEG

2.1 Systems Engineering: UML Design for Interface System Engineering: Create outline of UML and derived requirements artifacts. Software Engineering: Assist system engineering. Quality Engineering: Provide quality checks

2.2 Systems Engineering: System/Software Design

System Engineering: Design appropriate software components to display aeronautical expanse gauges within the technical specs guidelines for twenty-five different visual aspects. Include appropriate level of peer review.

Software Engineering: Assist system engineering. Quality Engineering: Provide quality checks.

2.3 Systems Engineering: Approve design

System Engineering: Derive component level requirements for Software Engineering to design, code, and unit test and System Test can provide System and Enterprise level testing.

Software Engineering: Assist system engineering

System Test Engineering: Derive sell-off acceptance criteria. Include appropriate peer review (including System Engineering) and customer approval.

Quality Engineering: Provide quality checks.

3.1 Software Engineering: Approve Content S/W Component Design System Engineering: Assist software engineering

Software Engineering: Provide appropriate level design artifacts from System Engineering UML design artifacts. Include appropriate level of peer review.

System Test Engineering: Derive sell-off acceptance criteria. Include appropriate peer review (including System Engineering) and customer approval.

Quality Engineering: Provide quality checks.

3.2 Software Engineering: Code and Unit Test

System Engineering: Assist software engineering

Software Engineering: Code and Unit Test software modules that execute the software which meets all topical and derived requirements. (* Minimum of 12 tasks)

Quality Engineering: Provide quality checks.

3.3 Software Engineering: Function Test (with actual gauges) System Engineering: Assist software engineering Software Engineering: Check the function Quality Engineering: Provide quality checks.

4.1 Test Engineering: Design Test Artifacts

System Engineering: Support with other engineers for opinion

Software Engineering: Support with other engineers for opinion

System Test Engineering: Derive System and Enterprise Level Test Cases. Include appropriate level of peer review.

Quality Engineering: Provide quality checks.

4.2 Test Engineering: Perform Environment Level Tests System Engineering: Support with other engineers for opinion Software Engineering: Support with other engineers for opinion System Test Engineering: Execute test cases as software modules become available Quality Engineering: Provide quality checks.

4.3 Test Engineering: Approve Test Services (with Customer Acceptance Criteria) System Test Engineering: Assist Quality Engineering

Quality Engineering: Quality checks during the processes described for System Engineering, Software Engineering, and System Test Engineering as appropriate

Include the following customer related reviews: Design Review (after System Engineering completes design artifacts), Pre-Ship Review (provided prior to Lear Jet Avionics acceptance of software).

4.4 Test Engineering: Run Test on Live Environment (Customer Facility) System Test Engineering: Assist Quality engineering

Quality Engineering: quality checks, and Final Acceptance Test (software demonstration at customer facility showing software meets all requirements as installed) installed)

4.5 System Test Engineering: Deploy to Operational Environment (Customer Facility) System Test Engineering: work with customer facility team for full deployment

Use approved installation instructions to deploy software into operational environment with support from customer facility team

*** Add more WBS activities as required or you deem necessary ***

Example: May want to add WBS level for Quality Engineering for derived tasks or those tasks could be incorporated in the WBS items noted above.

NOTIONAL ACTIVITY DURATION SCHEDULE

Notional Activity estimated Duration

The estimated total elapsed time for how long an activity will take from starts to finish, including associated waiting time. Also referred to as activity resource estimated or estimated activity resources.

Example only: Does not reflect tasks of this assignment. Be sure and remove any examples in your management response document.

PROJECT QUESTIONS & TASKS

1. Provide a project objective associated with the Lear Jet Avionics project. Include a list of assumptions about the project.

2. What is a work breakdown structure? What is a responsibility matrix? Using the Lear Jet Avionics project activity list and activity duration schedule, create a WBS and RAM.

Work Breakdown Structure (Should provide hierarchical graph) **

Responsibility Assignment Matrix

** (Example RAM Template: From different requirements. Be sure and remove any examples in your management response document.)

page9image15389360

3. (Major) List all activity costs. From the project activity list and activity duration schedule, estimate the cost of each activity. Then, determine the Total Budgeted Cost (TBC) for the Lear Jet Avionics project. Provide the information in table format by month. Objective evidence of derived costs is required for credit. Use labor and overhead rates as provided in your derived calculations.

4. Provide a cumulative budgeted cost curve and monthly budget curve for the Lear Jet Avionics project. Provide in appropriate graph format. This should represent both monthly budget and TBC over the period of performance of the project.

5. Lear Jet Avionics wants to know if you plan to use a management reserve for their project. Explain what the term reserve means and why you will use contingency reserve in the project or not. Be sure and consider the implications of using or not using the reserve. Provide appropriate detail in your response.

6. Lear Jet Avionics wants to know how TAMUC Software Consultants plans to employ cost management and earned value (EV) in their project. Explain to Lear Jet Avionics why it is necessary to calculate the earned value of work performed and how you plan to execute this task.

7. Lear Jet Avionics is concerned about how TAMUC Software Consultants will manage risks. Describe what TAMUC Software Consultants plans to do in order to manage risk on the Lear Jet Avionics project and if a risk assessment matrix will be employed and why. Provide appropriate level of detail in your response.

May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Total Seelect Layout Design Graphics Approve Design Write Content Approve Content Insert Content in Page Setup web services on test Perform tests Approve Web services Setup web services on live environment Total Budgeted cost

MayJuneJulyAugSepOct NovTotal

Seelect Layout

Design Graphics

Approve Design

Write Content

Approve Content

Insert Content in Page

Setup web services on test

Perform tests

Approve Web services

Setup web services on live environment

Total Budgeted cost

Applied Sciences
Architecture and Design
Biology
Business & Finance
Chemistry
Computer Science
Geography
Geology
Education
Engineering
English
Environmental science
Spanish
Government
History
Human Resource Management
Information Systems
Law
Literature
Mathematics
Nursing
Physics
Political Science
Psychology
Reading
Science
Social Science
Liberty University
New Hampshire University
Strayer University
University Of Phoenix
Walden University
Home
Homework Answers
Blog
Archive
Tags
Reviews
Contact
twitterfacebook
Copyright © 2022 SweetStudy.comSWEETSTUDY.COM YOUR HOMEWORK ANSWERS
chat0
Home.Literature.
Help.
Log in / Sign up
Project
profile
Sarprops1

BUSA428Project.docx
Home>Business & Finance homework help>Operations Management homework help>Project
BUSA428 Project

Use the project response Word document posted in doc sharing and begin to respond to all questions

Be sure and address each question/request in detail providing emphasis on project objectives

All graphs/charts/tables are to be produced in the native format (excel, project, etc.) and then copied into the response area of the Management Word document (picture ok)

Major Submission Requirement: Post BOTH the Management Word document with all responses/graphs/charts/tables in the D2l upload area. In either Word or PDF format. It is your responsibilities to ensure the document is readable and complete.