Feedback for the first Ethic Evaluation

Score (68/100)

you make many interesting points here. However, I felt a disconnect between the position you were arguing and the core tenets of utilitarianism itself. I did not see any argument as to how an ethical theory that supports the greatest good for the greatest number could possibly support Pippa’s decision. Moving forward, it’ll also be important to select citations from the primary text which you are tasked both with explaining and then applying to your argument. These are key opportunities to demonstrate knowledge of the material and to apply said knowledge to your argument. It’s also important to note that your thesis statement should already anticipate the theory you’ll be drawing on. Please feel free to reach out to me if you’d like to discuss my comments and feedback further, and/or to work together on your next assignment.

Ethical Decision Making and parental autonomy

It is morally acceptable for Pippa to exercise her parental autonomy and not vaccinate her daughter, even though that decision would put others at risk because Pippa’s decision is about to be informed by past events that have left her highly suspicious of the vaccination. However, I believe that it is her right to seek answers regarding the rubella vaccine, which is not forthcoming at the moment. The decision to seek vaccination does not feel her with joy but continued mental uncertainty, as it is the case of her three-year-old son, with whom she is not even sure whether the seizure that occurs is likely to reappear in the future. Therefore, it is imperative to understand and ensure that she is well informed and be allowed to make an informed decision. Thus, I will embrace the Utilitarianism theory, which fosters happiness and oppose actions that cause unhappiness.

Pippa is reluctant to take her daughter for the vaccine for reasons well known. Forcing her to vaccinate her child is unethical and violates the ethical concepts as defined under utilitarian theory. John Stuart Mill illustrates that three basic concepts need to be fully assessed in moral and ethical decision-making. These include personal happiness, an action that promotes peace, and ensuring that everyone’s satisfaction equally counts. From the basis of this theory, Pippa is not happy, which means that there is no personal happiness essential in building universal joy and peace. The consequence of an action is fundamental to decision making and thus should inform whether a given decision is morally and ethically sound or not (Mill et al. 68).

As a result, an action must base on the needs of numerous people in a specific situation. The assessment of these elements is based on a critical understanding of better processes, which is necessary for developing a positive sense of essential processes that define vital underlying concepts. Understanding fundamental concepts that define crucial aspects that help establish the validity of particular concerns is provided by evaluating various actions. As a result, it is necessary to comprehend the total impact of the activity expressed in many scenarios. Understanding strategic concepts that provide a strategic emphasis on better measurements that assist define positive transformation underpins the integration of essential processes within a particular context.

Pippa has two options in this case, and each of the decisions she makes has far-reaching consequences, although there is a difference to the extent of the decision and how easy it is to make an informed decision. One of the decisions is to vaccinate her daughter and live a life of unhappiness and many uncertainties. Another option is to reject vaccination until she can fully comprehend the basis of decision-making and understand the potential effects. However, based on the information provided, it is evident that refusing the vaccine is more fulfilling and brings her more joy and fewer uncertainties, which she should prioritize.

The ability to make an educated decision is based on the assessment of a given action’s outcomes. The methods used to complete a task are unimportant since they do not serve as a foundation for evaluating and developing critical conclusions. As a result, when a person is considering a decision, they must assess the consequences of the action, mainly whether the action is in many people’s best interests. As a result, a critical assessment of these notions is essential in defining strategic concepts that characterize positive development. The two principles are very much consistent with each other since they operate to create a shared understanding within a given setting. Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill developed the good with pleasure just like Epicurus. They also held that we ought to maximize the good, mainly focusing on the tremendous amount of good for the most significant number.

Thus, the decision made in this context assesses if a specific activity is valid and whether it will have the desired impact on an individual’s growth. In both cases, a critical evaluation of the action carries out to ensure that the action can be effectively integrated. It is essential to determining essential aspects that define a greater understanding of crucial concepts that represent a greater understanding of critical measures that restrict positive outcomes. Integration of higher-level thinking in determining a beneficial effect is based on a combination of essential processes that aid in comprehending strategic concepts that define key demands in individuals (Mill et al. 69).

Ethics play a critical role in focusing on the vital factors that characterize a positive connection in a fundamentally different way. Working for an organization where personal ethical values and underlying moral policy are successfully linked is always a good idea. However, there are times when a company’s ethical code and personal ethical values are at odds. A person’s understanding of the company’s ethical policy is critical in building a strong focus on critical factors that define a favorable corporate environment. The underlying positive concepts that define a strong understanding of the fundamental issue that defines positive change are quickly impacted (Mill et al. 70). The ethical policy incorporates fundamental principles that describe how people interact within a specific organizational framework. Within an organizational context, and ethical policy should take precedence, although personal moral ideas are critical in personal space.

Generating the greatest good for a large number means that many individuals tend to agree with a given issue in question, thus reducing the harmful effect on their overall well-being. Therefore, minimizing suffering is equal to generating the greatest good for the most significant number. It is the responsibility of healthcare providers to inform Pippa on the importance of vaccination and how she can overcome her fears and allow vaccination. She needs guidance to make an informed decision and ensure that she makes her happy and does not expose any individual to adverse risks that are likely to occur.

The article also outlines no specific theory that emphasizes assigning pleasures of the intellect, feeling of imagination and moral sentiments. A much higher satisfaction defines a broader perspective that defines individual-level well-being and performance. The utilitarian writers have concentrated on mental well-being superiority over bodily pleasure, safety, and costliness. This means that for Pippa, her mental well-being is better and defines the overall ability to make an informed choice based on the current information. It is also worth noting that some kinds of pleasure are more valuable than others hence build a more interactive context for change and improved performance (Mill et al. 71).